My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-04-2024 PC Packet
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2024
>
12-04-2024 PC Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/27/2024 4:08:27 PM
Creation date
11/27/2024 4:04:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
135
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – November 6, 2024 3 <br /> <br /> <br />Consultant Planner Hofer stated this Ordinance does not restrict this activity. He commented <br />he was not well versed in the regulations surrounding the production of beer, wine, spirits and <br />cannabis products. He indicated any producer would need to be licensed through the OCM and <br />believed this would be dealt with at the State level and not the local level. <br /> <br />Commissioner Collins questioned if liquor stores could sell THC beverages in Arden Hills. <br /> <br />Consultant Planner Hofer commented this Ordinance would not address this, rather this was <br />addressed through previous legislation that addressed low potency products and was passed in <br />2023. He explained the Ordinance before the Commission was to address full potency cannabis <br />products, which includes cannabis flowers, gummies and high potency THC beverages. <br /> <br />Commissioner Bjorklund asked how many retail shops the City was required to have, since <br />Arden Hills didn’t have 12,500 residents. <br /> <br />Consultant Planner Hofer reported the City was required to have at least one retail shop, but <br />could choose to allow any number of shops through the registration process. <br /> <br />Commissioner Bjorklund questioned if a 1,000 foot setback from schools, daycares and <br />churches could be applied for this adult use. <br /> <br />Consultant Planner Hofer stated as discussed by the City Council, this type of buffer was not <br />allowed by state statute. He reported the Statute allows a 1,000 foot setback from schools and a <br />500 foot setback from daycares, residential treatment centers, and park equipment. <br /> <br />Commissioner Bjorklund commented on how the B-4 district was set back as it was. He <br />discussed how cannabis would be a destination purchase versus being an impulse purchase. He <br />thanked staff for the time and thought they put into the proposed cannabis Ordinance. He asked <br />how odor complaints would be addressed, noting he wanted complaints to be real and not <br />harassing. <br /> <br />Commissioner Lindau thanked staff for their efforts on the Ordinance. He indicated the only <br />thing he saw that may have to be addressed was on Page 14 of the OCM Ordinance pertaining to <br />cannabis events. He questioned if this language would be included in the City’s ordinance. <br /> <br />Consultant Planner Hofer reported temporary events would be regulated in the section that <br />addresses registration. <br /> <br />Chair Weber asked if the City was considering setting a cap on the number of retail <br />establishments. <br /> <br />Consultant Planner Hofer stated the City Council was considering setting the cap at one retail <br />establishment. <br /> <br />Further discussion ensued regarding how the City would choose a path forward for selecting the <br />one retailer in the community. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.