My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-16-24-SWS
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2024
>
12-16-24-SWS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/17/2024 2:33:46 PM
Creation date
12/17/2024 2:32:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION — AUGUST 12, 2024 12 <br />Councilmember Monson summarized information on Highway 51 is forthcoming. The trail <br />discussion and direction from the Governor are needed. <br />Councilmember Holden asked about the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), if we <br />would get some money for some parks. <br />Public Works Director and City Engineer Swearing stated the plan is to apply for it again in <br />the spring, if it's available, for Arden Manor Court. <br />C. HKGi Ordinance Review Engagement Plan <br />Interim City Administrator Jagoe reminded the Council that previously HKGi presented the <br />phasing and schedule for the ordinance review. After discussion with the Council, they put <br />together a draft community engagement plan. The plan includes four phases for engagement. Part <br />of that would start immediately after tonight's discussion. Phase 1 would be an initial introduction <br />of the project to the public. Phase 2 would be additional engagement to include a website page, <br />featuring ordinance revision in the newsletter, survey work, engagement with committees and <br />commissions. Phase 3 might be a pop-up event. Phase 4 would be the final adoption of the <br />ordinance, open houses and the public hearing. <br />HKGi is requesting feedback from the Council on the engagement plan. They also want to know <br />if there is anyone else they should target. She gave some examples. <br />Councilmember Holden is concerned that there is no Community Development Director. She is <br />worried about the timeline and the amount of work and not having the staff to deal with all the <br />issues. She wondered when the phases would go. <br />Interim City Administrator Jagoe replied that HKGi will be doing the heavy lifting on this. She <br />will give them the feedback from Council but the consultants are the ones hosting the pop up <br />events and putting together the survey. <br />Mayor Grant said the personnel committee met and discussed this topic. This might be a project <br />that needs to be paced and slowed down. His concern is HKGi will get started and then it turns <br />out to be more than staff can handle. He wants to see this project paced so it won't overwhelm <br />staff. <br />Councilmember Rousseau thought this seemed good. She is sure the PTRC or the EDC might <br />have feedback around ordinances, too. The EDC is starting to do some brief visits with businesses <br />and that could be beneficial on a project like this. <br />Councilmember Monson said she also has concerns about staff time but she is comfortable as <br />long as staff is comfortable. <br />Interim City Administrator Jagoe stated the engagement piece will be HKGi. As the project <br />moves into the ordinance and development of the code there will be more staff involvement. <br />Decisions like if there will be revisions to the existing code or is it a multitude of new ordinances. <br />As far as the engagement piece, HKGi will do all of that. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.