My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 07-12-2004
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
CC 07-12-2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:11:23 PM
Creation date
11/9/2006 1:27:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />ARDEN HILLS REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES <br />JULY 12,2004 <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden asked what the City's liability was with licensing this. Mr. HeIlegers <br />replied the applicant would need to indemnifY the City if a liability issue would arise. He noted <br />the City Attorney was aware of this issue and would address it in the Licensing Agreement. <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant asked if this would be a perpetual license. Mr, HeIlegers replied he did <br />not think it would be perpetual, but he had not had the opportunity to share this with the <br />applicant. <br /> <br />John Finn, applicant, 3331 New Brighton, stated the encroachment was not done maliciously <br />and they thought the property line went along the line of trees, which they had planted. He stated <br />they already had moved all of the fences, so all of the encroachments with the exception of the <br />turnaround had been taken care of. He stated he did not completely understand the License <br />Agreement issue, but he would be willing to include the encroachment as a part of his <br />homeowner's insurance and he would work with whatever they needed to work with to keep the <br />trees on the north side. <br /> <br />Mayor Aplikowski stated it was her understanding that the City Attorney was having this only <br />as a suggestion and asked if this could come back at a later time. Ms. Wolfe replied the <br />Licensing Agreement issue could be brought back at a future date. <br /> <br />Mayor Aplikowski noted the motion would only pertain to the two conditions as noted in staffs <br />report. <br /> <br />A discussion ensued as to whether the Planning Commission had approved five or six feet. The <br />Recording Secretary read from the Minutes of the Planning Commission and they had approved <br />six feet <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant amended his motion to Condition number 2 to read six feet, rather than <br />five feet. Conncilmember Holden agreed to the amendment. <br /> <br />The motion carried unanimously (4-0). <br /> <br />Mayor Aplikowski requested staff get further information regarding the License Agreement <br />from the City Attorney. <br /> <br />E, Desilmate "Absentee Board" for Elections <br /> <br />Ms. Wolfe stated individuals who will be absent or otherwise prevented from going to the <br />polling place on election days because of a disability may vote by "absentee ballot" by <br />completing a "Request for Absentee Ballot" application. In years of Presidential elections, a <br />significant amount of these absentee ballots are applied for by residents who cannot attend the <br />poll on either Election Day. For this reason, staff would like to designate a board consisting of <br />City Hall staff members to accept/reject these envelopes to save the Election Judges from having <br />to perform this task on Election Day. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.