Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORKSESSION <br /> JULY 19, 2004 4 <br /> . A resident mentioned that there has been a tremendous improvement over the past three to four <br /> years due to the deputies patrolling the neighborhood. A resident suggested that signs be placed <br /> that specifically prohibits the students from parking during the regular school hours. A resident <br /> mentioned that there used to be problems, but he felt that they have disappeared. Another <br /> resident expressed concern about signs being placed in their yards. <br /> Towards the end, the Council asked staff to research the following options: <br /> . Parking by permit only <br /> . Designating "school zone" <br /> . Beef up communication <br /> . Uniform signage throughout the neighborhood. <br /> 2.D. Redevelopment Proiects <br /> Scott Clark discussed three projeets around the City. Mr. Clark was seeking a direction with <br /> regards to the properties. He mentioned the Old City Hall site, Indykiewicz Property, and <br /> Chesapeake Property. <br /> The Old City Hall site has 6.5 acres. He spoke about the zoning issues with regards to its usage. <br /> He requested the COW1cil to determine the end use ofthe property. He mentioned that there were <br /> e inquiries for townhouses and neighborhood businesses. Possible options to eonsider: Medical <br /> Clinic, Charter Sehool, Townhouses, or some other business that generates tax revenue. Council <br /> direction as to pursue medical, office or potential retail but not townhouses. <br /> Mr. Clark talked about the Indykiewicz property's offer and cOW1ter-offer. A question was <br /> raised if staff had considered making a counter-offer less than the price determined by the <br /> appraisal. There was a general eonsensus that the property's location would be most suitable for <br /> a gas station/convenience store. <br /> Mr. Clark also talked about the Chesapeake Property. He mentioned that staff had met with <br /> representatives from Chesapeake Properties in June to gain an understanding of issues associated <br /> with the development. Overall, staff would like direction from the Council with regards to its <br /> future development. The COUlleil stated that there was no agreement regarding the increment <br /> financing. <br /> 2.E. 2005 - 2009 CIP/PMP <br /> Murtuza Siddiqui presented a consolidated five-year CIP program. He explained that the CIP is <br /> comprehensive and contains technology upgrades and all eonstruction or improvement projects. <br /> Mr. Siddiqui emphasized and highlighted the cash flow situation if the Council proceeds with the <br /> proposed projects. He mentioned that the Enterprise Funds, in aggregate, are in a break-even <br /> mode from an operational perspective and the rates were last reviewed in 2001. He mentioned <br /> . that if the City continues to fund the proposed projects, the Enterprise funds will be depleted in <br /> the next couple of years. A rate study and review of projects is essential. Mr. Siddiqui <br /> mentioned that the Council may have to eonsider financing options for these projects. The <br />