My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCWS 08-23-2004
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
CCWS 08-23-2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:11:23 PM
Creation date
11/9/2006 1:27:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORKSESSION <br /> AUGUST 23, 2004 6 <br />. Option C <br /> I. Install new beam along south edge of bridge: <br /> 2. Remove southern guard rail: <br /> 3. Construct 10Ft walk along south sidc of bridge: <br /> 4. Allow for interior rail between traffic and sidewalk; <br /> 5. Estimated Cost -$180,000. <br /> Possible Enhancements: <br /> 1. Ornamental railings; <br /> 2. Decorative Lighting; <br /> 3. Concrete patterns and pilasters. <br /> The proposed sidewalk improvements would run along the southern boulevard between the <br /> freeway ramp and Highway 10. City Engineer and staff feci that a 6 foot concrete walk is the <br /> preferred option. <br /> City staff would like to bid the project this winter. Proposed construction would begin next <br /> spring or summer. A majority of the residents are in favor of the proposed bridge, but a few <br /> residents have expressed reservations regarding the proposed sidewalk installation. <br /> Mr. Bill Henry (PTRC Chair) recommends that the bridge and sidewalk be installed with the <br />. sidewalk set back from the street. <br /> City Administrator Wolfe reeommended that all options be explored and that hopefully this <br /> information will be useful in coming to a solution that best represents the interests of the <br /> community. <br /> The affected roadway is 54 feet long. The City would be using 10 feet of the existing 15 feet of <br /> Ramsey County right-of-way. The worse case scenario is a 40 foot yard with a 15 foot right-of- <br /> way. <br /> A pedestrian count was completed by staff to document the number of residents that use the <br /> sidewalks at: <br /> . Freeway Park; <br /> . North Hamline; <br /> . Arden Place; <br /> . Snelling Avenue: <br /> . Connelly Avenue; <br /> . Pine Tree Drive. <br /> If the bridge is reconstructed, the north side would not be the preferred location for a sidewalk <br /> based upon the number of underground utilities and topography issues that would have to be <br /> addressed before the sidewalk could be installed in this area. <br />. Council Member Larson noted that the proposed sidewalk, on the south side, runs adjacent to <br /> two of the City's parks. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.