My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCWS 09-20-2004
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
CCWS 09-20-2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:11:24 PM
Creation date
11/9/2006 1:27:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORKSESSION <br /> September 20, 2004 8 <br />. Council Member Holden was wondering if the City currently maintains the sidewalks? <br /> Tom Moore, Operations and Maintenance Director, noted that the City does maintain the <br /> sidewalks year around. The City's snow removal equipment is for sidewalks that are five feet <br /> and wider. <br /> Council Member Grant would like to see a cost comparison of the proposed sidewalk if it was <br /> placed on the north side of County Road E. He also believes that this project should be delayed. <br /> Mayor Aplikowski was wondering if the sidewalk is a safety concern. Should the neighbors be <br /> asked to provide more input on this project. The neighborhood needs to buy into this project. <br /> Council Member Larson mentioned that the proposal is part of the City's master plan. The south <br /> side of the street is not economically feasible due to the grading and utility lines located in this <br /> area. The proposed trail would run along Snelling Avenue and connect to two of the City's <br /> parks. People are currently walking in the street. Installing sidewalks in this area would benefit <br /> the City of Arden Hills as a whole. It is the City Council's job to make difficult decisions. <br /> Council Member Holden stated that the residents she has spoken to feel that the sidewalk is a <br /> waste oftax dollars. <br /> Council Member Larson noted the PTRC (Parks, Trails, Recreation Commission) would not <br />. have recommended this proposal without the new sidewalk. <br /> Mayor Aplikowski stated that the bridge and sidewalk are not a package deal. The bridge was <br /> approved by the PTRC before the sidewalk. <br /> Engineer Brown mentioned that state funding may available for the bridge and sidewalk <br /> installation. The Council could request that eighty percent of the costs be covered by cooperative <br /> agreement dollars. The proj ect scope must be finalized as a bridge or bridge and sidewalk <br /> project before the City can seek funding from the State of Minnesota. <br /> Mayor Aplikowski stated that there was a consensus and both items will be brought to a future <br /> Council meeting for action. The affected neighborhood will be notified ofthis Council meeting. <br /> Replacement Vehicles <br /> Council Member Holden requested that she be able to view a piece of equipment that is <br /> scheduled for replacement. She wants to ensure that the City is not replacing equipment on the <br /> basis of age alone. Maintenance costs should be the primary reason why a piece of equipment is <br /> replaced. <br /> City Administrator Wolfe noted that a piece of equipment will not be replaced solely on the basis <br /> of age. <br />. City staff is in the process of creating a more accurate system for monitoring vehicle records. <br /> This will be a valuable tool in tracking vehicle expenditures in the future. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.