My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 10-12-2004
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
CC 10-12-2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:11:24 PM
Creation date
11/9/2006 1:27:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> ARDEN HILLS REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES <br /> OCTOBER 12, 2004 3 <br />. Mr. Brown stated tbe City developed a Parks and Trails Master Plan, which outlined the <br /> improvements for park and trails throughout the City. The Plan was adopted in 2002 after a <br /> resident survey was conducted and indicated that expanding the trail network was a high priority. <br /> The Plan aims to connect the Arden Hills' community through an efficient and safe trail system <br /> that will provide residents an opportunity for healthy exercise and inter-community <br /> connectedness. Currently, there are very narrow walkways on both sides of the bridge. These <br /> inadequate walkways along the County Road E bridge over TH5l are the only crossing between <br /> Lydia Avenue in Roseville and 1-694. This area is considered a weak link in the trail system and <br /> a "choke point" for pedestrian traffic. For these reasons, the Council directed staff to look into <br /> improving the pedestrian crossing and sidewalk options. The proposed plan would extend the <br /> trail system across County Road E bridge to Lindey's Park. Future trail plans include a trail that <br /> will connect Lake Johanna to Lindey's Park and another trail that will traverse north and south <br /> from Lindey's Park along Snelling Avenue and Old Highway 10. <br /> Mr. Brown indicated staff requests Council provide direction on project scope and take <br /> appropriate action on the Resolution. <br /> Mr. Brown noted in terms of the bridge, staff believed that this is a significant safety concern <br /> and major "choke point" for the City. He indicated the bridge improvement was being <br /> recommended. <br />e Mr. Brown stated staff supported the concept of the sidewalk as a connection to an overall City <br /> trail system as outlined in the Parks and Trails Master Plan. However, recognizing the <br /> intrusiveness into existing residential yards, staff would recommend the least intrusive, yet viable <br /> option available. Most likely this would be the option with a 2-foot setback with a 6-foot <br /> sidewalk. Trail linkage and pedestrian safety were the primary reasons for supporting the <br /> sidewalk concept. <br /> Mayor Aplikowski clarified the reason for the Resolution was because they were asking for <br /> funds from the State. Mr. Brown replied that was correct. <br /> Mayor Aplikowski asked what was the difference between the Option B bridge and the Option <br /> C bridge. Mr. Brown replied the width of the sidewalk was a factor. He noted the sidewalk <br /> would go from 7 feet wide to 10 feet wide and there would also be an interior rail. He noted with <br /> option B, the roadway would need to be made narrower. <br /> Mayor Aplikowski noted the Council had already made the bridge decision, but they had not <br /> decided what type of bridge they would be putting in. <br /> Dave Webster, 3529 Snelling Avenue, stated they have lived in their neighborhood for 25 years <br /> and they had always wanted a wider sidewalk across the bridge. He noted a car on the bridge hit <br />. his son who was on a bike a few years ago. He stated he approved of this project and it would be <br /> an improvement to the neighborhood. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.