My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCWS 10-18-2004
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
CCWS 10-18-2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:11:24 PM
Creation date
11/9/2006 1:27:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORKSESSION <br /> October 18, 2004 5 <br /> . Engineer Brown stated that the City will attach a map to identify the different streets in the <br /> neighborhood projects. <br /> Councilmember Grant wondered why the City has so many reconstruction projects scheduled? <br /> Greg Brown mentioned that the City evaluates and rates the bituminous surface, drainage, curb <br /> and gutter, storm water drainage, and the status of the utilities before determining a project's <br /> priority status. Typically asphalt that is rated with a 60-80% PCI is scheduled for mill and <br /> overlay. If the bituminous surface receives a rating under 60%, the bituminous surface may need <br /> to be reconstructed. <br /> Councilmember Holden asked if PCI is the largest factor in determining road repairs. <br /> Engineer Brown agreed that the PCI rating is the largest factor in determining future road repairs. <br /> Councilmember Larson wondered what changed in the utility rate study? <br /> Finance Director Siddiqui stated that the numbers did change a little bit. The City's cash balance <br /> dropped when the projected utility rates were set at $18.00 per household on average as <br /> requested by the Council <br /> Councilmember Larson was wondering why the cash balance dropped? <br /> . Mr. Siddiqui mentioned that study is a "cash flow" model. A reduction in revenue resulted in a <br /> drop in the cash balance. Mr. Siddiqui also noted that the revenue portion of the utility rate study <br /> dropped as did the numbers on the proposed CIP projects. The average rate increase is $ I 8.00 <br /> per quarter for residents that use 15,000 gallons of water during the winter months. If a resident <br /> uses more than 15,000 gallons of water their utility bill will show an increase based upon their <br /> consumption. It was also pointed out that the proposed rate structure has a usage component for <br /> sewer rates beyond the 15,000 gallons per quarter average. <br /> Councilmember Grant asked which projects were pushed back or removed? <br /> Engineer Brown reported that the sanitary sewer fund was reduced and the number of lift stations <br /> being remodeled were minimized from 3 to 2 on a yearly basis. <br /> Finance Director Siddiqui noted that the proposed expenditures were based on today's material <br /> cost. The cost for supplies and materials may rise in the future. <br /> Engineer Brown mentioned that water repairs are fairly reasonable in cost. The City has already <br /> repaired approximately 30,000 feet of clay pipe and 15,000 feet of water line that has been sealed <br /> or lined. The City has approximately $3.5 million in lining and sealing projects over the next 13 <br /> years. The worst water pipe areas in the City have already been repaired. <br /> . Councilmember Larson believes that the City may have to construct a new water tower if the <br /> City proceeds with the TCAAP project. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.