CC 10-25-2004 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

ARDEN HILLS REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OCTOBER 25, 2004 6 . 7. UNFINISHED BUSINESS A. CHESAPEAK MASTER PUD EXTENSION Mr. Hellegers eXplained the applicant had requested a one-year extension for the Master Plan PUD, He reviewed the background for the Council and indicated staff recommends approval of the requested one-year extension (to allow Chesapeake Companies to submit a Final Plan PUD no later than September 25, 2005) subject to the application continuing to abide by the thirteen (13) existing conditions of approval and adding a fourteenth condition of approval to read: "At the time of application for the Final PUD the City would reserve the right for an updated traffic study, EA W, or other supplementary documents as necessary. If there are additional development regulations that change significantly prior to the application for the Final Plan PUD, the City would reserve the right to have Chesapeake comply with those new development regulations". Councilmember Rem asked if the applicant had agreed to all of the conditions, Mr. Hellegers replied tlle only change was adding Condition 14 and the previous Conditions had been previously approved by the applicant in 2001, . Mr. Carlson, applicant, stated they had agreed to all of the conditions. Councilmember Larson asked applicant if Council had previously approved two office buildings, Mr. Carlson replied they had discussed different options previously, Councilmember Larson stated he could not remember a schematic for two tall buildings, He asked if the applicant was thinking about a schematic that involved two tall buildings, rather than one, Mr. Carlson replied the market would determine what would be built there. Councilmember Grant stated he remembered there were two plans in 2001. Mr. Carlson replied they had presented various options to Council in 2001, MOTION: Councilmember Grant moved and Councilmember Holden seconded a motion to approve a one-year extension of the Master Plan PUD subject to the fourteen conditions of approval as stated in staffs October 25, 2004 report. Councilmember Larson stated he hoped now that the applicant had the land under their control they would be more aggressive with their marketing. He indicated he would support this, but he would like to see some progress with the development '. The motion carried unanimously (5-0).