My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-08-25 PC Packet
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2025
>
01-08-25 PC Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/2/2025 3:24:21 PM
Creation date
1/2/2025 3:23:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
64
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – December 4, 2024 10 <br /> <br /> <br />Chair Weber opened the public hearing at 8:03 p.m. <br /> <br />Chair Weber invited anyone for or against the application to come forward and make comment. <br /> <br />There being no comment Chair Weber closed the public hearing at 8:04 p.m. <br /> <br />Councilmember Rousseau discussed the City’s fee schedule and asked when was the last time <br />the City updated its park dedication fees. <br /> <br />Interim City Administrator Jagoe reported this was last done in approx. 2015/2016. <br /> <br />Chair Weber stated it would be useful to know if other cities have recently made changes or <br />updates to their park or residential dedication fees. <br /> <br />Commissioner Wicklund stated he was in favor of pushing this project forward. He indicated he <br />was comfortable with the increased density, FAR and building height. He explained the value of <br />the entire parcel was $22 million and the developer was proposing to purchase 10 of the 40 acres. <br />He stated this would lead to a land dedication payment (at 15%) of $825,000. He suggested the <br />Commission deal with the affordable housing piece as a separate motion or condition for <br />approval. <br /> <br />Interim City Administrator Jagoe commented on the City’s public use dedication and park <br />development fees. She indicated the City could waive public use dedication fees and <br />recommended the Commission discuss this matter further, but noted subsidizing the development <br />for affordable housing would have to meet a “but for” test. She explained the developer should <br />assess whether or not a fee waiver was necessary. <br /> <br />Chair Weber stated if the Commission were to ask for affordable housing, could the <br />Commission offer an amendment to waive fees or recommend the City negotiate as necessary in <br />order to achieve affordable housing units. <br /> <br />Interim City Administrator Jagoe reported if the Commission wants this brought forward, she <br />recommended the developer communicate if this was something they would be seeking from the <br />City. She explained the affordable housing request was a new add that staff had not prepared for. <br /> <br />Chair Weber stated a lot of information would have to be gathered that may put this project in a <br />table situation. <br /> <br />Interim City Administrator Jagoe indicated this may be the case. She stated the Commission <br />could make a recommendation on public use dedication but noted other reduction of fees or <br />waivers should wait until the developer brings forward a request to ensure all criteria within the <br />City’s public financing guidelines for affordable housing requirements were being met. <br /> <br />Chair Weber stated the Commission could make a recommendation with respect to park <br />dedication and land dedication and the City Council could take it from there. He explained if <br />there was no agreement on affordable housing, this project may not happen in its current form. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.