My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 04-14-2003
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
CC 04-14-2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:11:26 PM
Creation date
11/9/2006 1:40:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />ARDEN HILLS REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES <br />APRIL 14, 2003 <br /> <br />15 <br /> <br />Mr. Hartford stated the Shoreline Ordinance did not say "shall", it said "may" <br />with substandard lots and according to the City, and this was a substandard lot. <br />He stated the assessment policy addressed substandard lots and gave criteria for <br />exception. He asked the Council for this exception. <br /> <br />Ms. Swanson stated she felt the Association property had met the criteria set out <br />in the assessment policy for a removal from the assessment roll. <br /> <br />Phillip a Lindauist, 911 Inl!erson Road, stated this was not a sophisticated piece <br />ofland. She noted this piece ofland is very rustic, a nature area. There is no road <br />and Ingerson Road was a half a block away. She stated the benefit was only what <br />people wanted to pull from it. She stated she did not believe there was much <br />monetary value in the property. <br /> <br />William Krivit, 1252 Inl!erson Court, stated he did not understand why the road <br />improvement would make any difference for the use ofthe land, <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden asked if taking the property off the assessment roll <br />would that be a permanent thing for the future, <br /> <br />Mr. Parrish replied they could defer the assessment off the roll and if it were to <br />come back at a later date for development, the assessment could be applied at that <br />time. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden asked how the street assessments on the other properties <br />increase their market value. <br /> <br />Mr. Filla stated Cities were able to assess street improvements because they were <br />needed by the residents and if they were not maintained, that would affect the <br />market value. There was also an aesthetic value of a street attached to a home, <br /> <br />Mayor Aplikowski stated if the road was in disrepair, it did detract from the value <br />of a home, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.