My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-09-24-WS
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2020-2029
>
2024
>
12-09-24-WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/14/2025 9:57:09 AM
Creation date
1/14/2025 9:56:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION — DECEMBER 9, 2024 17 <br />Councilmember Holden doesn't think we should do the Term Sheet until we know the County <br />has an agreement with them. It doesn't make sense to discuss the Term Sheet before we know <br />what their agreement is. The issue is the Term Sheet is a proposal on how we are moving forward <br />so it may be null and void, depending on that agreement. <br />Councilmember Monson agreed. She thinks the Term Sheet discussion should take place after <br />we know if the County agrees to the PSA. She also thinks Stacie Kvilvang is essential to the <br />discussion and should be there for any discussion on the Term Sheet. <br />Mayor Grant said Stacie Kvilvang should take what Council decisions are, potentially run the <br />numbers, but have her sit through a meeting and listen to what our preferences are. <br />Councilmember Monson said she was pretty active in the last meeting. <br />Mayor Grant doesn't think it's to our advantage to have her in the meeting. We know what the <br />numbers are. <br />Councilmember Rousseau asked if there will be a meeting on December 23ra <br />Mayor Grant said there is not a meeting on December 23ra <br />Councilmember Rousseau asked when we would need the union information. <br />Interim City Administrator Jagoe said we have already provided them the response. They have <br />taken the vote. We should be ready to bring something forth on December 16a`. <br />Councilmember Rousseau and Councilmember Monson are okay with using December 161h for <br />Union Discussion. <br />Mayor Grant agreed. He said Council had December 16a' as a place holder, so it makes sense to <br />use that meeting time for this item. He will work with Staff regarding what else may be on that <br />agenda. It could also be planned to be a short meeting. <br />Councilmember Monson would be fine with a short meeting. <br />Councilmember Rousseau would like to have Council use January and February to knock off <br />some of the longstanding topics. <br />Councilmember Holden thinks Legislative Priorities should be discussed in January. <br />Councilmember Rousseau wondered if the December meeting was too early to discuss that. <br />Interim City Administrator Jagoe said that might be a little early for Staff. <br />Councilmember Holden thinks Staff should ask Council what they want. <br />Mayor Grant said we need to have that discussion, whether Staff is ready or not. He thinks we <br />should go forward with the force main. That packet is done, it hasn't changed. The force main is <br />still relevant. There may be some pricing changes. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.