My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-13-25-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2025
>
01-13-25-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/14/2025 1:47:26 PM
Creation date
1/14/2025 1:28:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
444
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – DECEMBER 9, 2024 9 <br /> <br />speaking to the Council about the unsustainability of underfunding the budget and deficit <br />spending. She indicated she would not continue with the unsustainability of the underfunding <br />because she believed this was fiscally irresponsible. She supported keeping the budget balanced, <br />while also keeping the general fund at a minimum with inflation. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant asked why there was an asterisk on the 2024 general fund. <br /> <br />Finance Director Yang reported this indicates the 2024 general fund was predicted as of the end <br />of September. She commented she does have another projection as of the end of November that <br />shows the City was approximately $14,000 short. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant commented when looking across the years, the ending fund balances were around <br />$3 million each year. He was of the opinion the City was doing pretty good meeting obligations <br />and raising taxes in an amount that equals what will be spent. He discussed how surpluses have <br />been transferred out in the past per the City’s fund balance policy. He noted the City did <br />underfund this year by about $180,000, but in the final analysis, the City spent close to what was <br />projected. He reported this was done each year because the City has not spent 100% of every <br />single cost center as this would overtax the residents. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden stated the $400,000 that was transferred was set aside for future <br />equipment replacement or vehicle purchases and noted this overage was the City overtaxing its <br />residents. She commented these purchases have to be made out of the general fund and the <br />Council had put these funds aside for CIP purchases. She indicated she was concerned with the <br />fact the proposed budget has not had any strategic planning, but rather items were added and were <br />being approved. She discussed how the City had three major trails coming up that would require <br />City funding. She was of the opinion trails were more important to the community than parks <br />because 27% of the City’s population was 15 and under. She did not believe a master park plan <br />should be a priority at this time and she did not believe the City’s parks were underfunded. She <br />reported the City’s parks were in really good shape and were always well manicured. She <br />commented further on potential cuts that could be made to the budget. She recommended the <br />parks master plan be pushed out several years in order to assist with reducing the tax levy. <br /> <br />Councilmember Rousseau explained this reminded her of the discussions that were held last <br />year noting the Council voted to support a 12.5% tax levy increase. She noted the Mayor <br />supported only a 10% levy increase. She discussed how approving the 12.5% levy increase kept <br />the general fund budget on track. She hoped Councilmember Holden would support the parks <br />master plan in order to make the City’s parks a priority going forward. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant reported earlier there was a comment about growing the City’s tax base. He agreed <br />the City wanted to grow its tax base through TCAAP, but noted this development would also <br />grow the City’s costs. He reported the Council voted to underfund the budget by $182,000 last <br />year and the last projection had the budget coming in within $14,000. He reported he did not <br />support overtaxing the residents of Arden Hills, which was why he supported some level of <br />underfunding. He discussed the proposed shelter building and noted the $85,000 expense was <br />quite high. He asked if the Hazelnut Park parking lot was in the budget at $315,000. <br /> <br />Finance Director Yang reported this expense was included in the budget. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.