My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-13-25-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2025
>
01-13-25-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/14/2025 1:47:26 PM
Creation date
1/14/2025 1:28:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
444
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – DECEMBER 9, 2024 14 <br /> <br />Councilmember Fabel stated during the course of the year the Council heard a compelling <br />presentation from Director Swearingen regarding the need for this additional staff member. He <br />indicated the positive and negatives aspects were reviewed by staff. He commented after hearing <br />the presentation, the Council recommended the position begin April 1. He recommended staff <br />speak to the necessity and negative impacts if this position were not to begin in April of 2025. <br /> <br />Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen commented this position was a necessary <br />component for operations for the City to get to the standard that is expected from residents. He <br />reported if the position were delayed, the City would remain in the same status it was today and <br />programs that could be developed by this new position would be further delayed. <br /> <br />Councilmember Fabel indicated Director Swearingen’s own time would be used more <br />efficiently and effectively if he didn’t have to do the tasks proposed for the new FTE. <br /> <br />Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen reported this was the case, noting he only <br />had so much bandwidth. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden reported many of the new tasks for Director Swearingen were voted on <br />by the Council. She asked what new parks programs were being proposed. <br /> <br />Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen stated he was speaking of programs very <br />broadly. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant commented three members of the Council prefer the 15.5% levy and if this were <br />the case, the levy would be set at 15.5%. He indicated he would venture to say 2% could be <br />removed from the levy. <br /> <br />Councilmember Monson stated she did not believe it was fair for the Mayor to assume what the <br />Council would or would not support. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant asked what items Councilmember Monson would like to cut from the budget. <br /> <br />Councilmember Monson indicated she was interested in hearing what the Mayor would like to <br />cut from the budget. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant commented he was of the opinion the City would not spend 100% of every cost <br />center. He noted last year the City underfunded the budget by $182,000. He suggested the levy <br />increase be reduced to 13.5%, which would be an underfunding of $106,000. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden stated she could support this number. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant stated the 2% decrease would offer residents some relief. He indicated it has been <br />expressed to him by residents that the City was devaluing their homes by raising taxes. He <br />appreciated the improvements the City was making in the community, which helps keep property <br />values up. <br /> <br />Councilmember Rousseau asked how a levy increase of 13.5% would impact the median value <br />homeowner. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.