CC 01-10-2000 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. . . ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - JANUARY 10, 2000 23 are higher than the estimate, additional funds would come from the General Fund. If the actual project costs are lower than the estimate then the excess funds go into the General Fund. He noted that some other communities determine the assessment rates after completion of the projects with the assessments being based on actual costs. Councilmember Aplikowski asked if there were other projects waiting to be started if the City does not move forward with this reconstruction project. Mr. Brown stated that there were other neighborhoods in the southern part of the City that were at a level of deterioration to justifY reconstruction. He indicated that one of these neighborhoods could be slated for reconstruction. Mayor Probst noted that a feasibility study has not been done for any other neighborhood at this time. Mr. Brown concurred and added that it was unlikely that any other project would begin this year. Councilmember Aplikowski stated that she was tempted to suggest that the City pull this project off the board completely. However, if this was done, this project would be placed at the bottom of the list. Mayor Probst stated it was obvious that the City was not prepared to proceed with this project as currently proposed. He felt it would not be appropriate to attempt to redesign the project at this time. He was not certain how to proceed at this point, however, modifications clearly needed to be made according to the input received this evening. He suspected that once the project is modified there will still be some disagreements on the part of the residents. He noted that historically, the City has attempted to prioritize the worst streets based on their pavement ratings and reconstruct those streets individually. The problem with this method was that one street had been reconstructed with an assessment cost of$30 per foot and a neighboring street was reconstructed one year later with an assessment cost of$35 per foot. Additionally, there had been issues with the construction equipment being back in the same neighborhood. As a matter of policy, the City Council is now trying to manage the Pavement Management Plan on a neighborhood by neighborhood basis. The streets in the Ingerson neighborhood had been identified collectively as a starting point for the southern portion of the City. Councilmember Rem stated that given the comments made this evening she was in favor of postponing the project for at least one year. However, she was not in favor of delaying the project indefinitely and moving it to the bottom ofthe list. She understood the reluctance of the neighborhood to move forward with the reconstruction project and felt strongly that it would be helpful if the neighborhood received better notification. She suggested that the project be revisited in the spring time when the concerns about drainage can be looked at closely. She also suggested that the project be broken up over two years, as the Council had previously discussed. Mayor Probst stated that if the reconstruction work was not ordered at this time, the City will not be able to include the project in this year's construction season. He stated that if the City wished to continue consideration of this neighborhood it must move forward with changes being made to the project. He felt that if the City makes the decision to proceed with the reconstruction of this neighborhood, the process should be slowed down. Ifthe Council was not comfortable with moving forward with this neighborhood, the project should be set aside and another project should be found. He agreed that the residents should be provided with better notification.