Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - JANUARY 10,2000 <br /> <br />8 <br /> <br />. - The age of the streets: The original construction of the streets in this neighborhood occurred <br />around the 1960's. Four of the streets were overlaid approximately 10 years ago and the life <br />of an overlay was considered to be five to seven years. The surface ratings of the asphalt <br />ranged from very poor to good. The composite rating was 55, which was the lowest ofthe <br />neighborhoods that were reviewed. <br />· The drainage evaluation: The Ingerson neighborhood had the worst surface drainage <br />evaluation of all the neighborhoods that were reviewed. Routine ponding occurs in the <br />streets and all the water runoff currently runs directly into Lake Josephine and Lake Johanna <br />without any treatment. In order to mitigate this problems, ponding sites had been identified <br />on a preliminary basis tlmt would allow the water quality issues to be addressed. The intent <br />would be to construction ponds west of I-1amline Avenue and in the ravine area from <br />F emwood Avenue to Lake Josephine. This neighborhood was a good candidate to control <br />water quality issues. <br /> <br />Mr. Brown stated that the ranking system that was developed was based on the function of the <br />street. One issue was if whether the water runs away from the pavement so as not to destroy the <br />integrity of the pavement. This was the ranking that received a score of 110. The second factor <br />was whether the water flowing trom the neighborhood was running treated or untreated into a <br />natural body of water. In this ncighborhood, none of the water is treated by filtration ponds prior <br />to running into the lakes and wetlands. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst asked that the audience allow the presentation to be completed prior to asking <br />questions. <br /> <br />Mr. Brown stated that the final reason the Ingerson neighborhood was at the top of the list for <br />reconstruction was nonconformity to the City street standards. The majority of the streets in this <br />neighborhood do not conform to the current City standards. <br /> <br />Mr. Brown stated that the proposed improvements to the neighborhood were: <br /> <br />- Reconstruct Carlton Drive, Fernwood Road, Fernwood Court, Ingerson Avenue, Ingerson <br />Court, North I-1amline Avenue south ofIngerson Avenue and Cannon Avenue. Mr. Brown <br />stated that a number of alternatives were being considered in conj unction with this <br />reconstruction. The reconstruction of these streets would include curb and gutter installation <br />and bituminous paving with a sand sub-base and draining tile. <br />. To address the water quality issues, one or two ponds were proposed on the west side of <br />I-1amline Avenue, as well as improvements to the Fernwood Court channel. The <br />improvements to the channel would include deepening the existing channel to Lake <br />Josephine and the construction of a weir at the channel outlet to the lake, thereby increasing <br />the cleansing affect of the channel on storm water runofT prior to entering Lake Josephine. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Mr. Brown stated that the proposed reconstruction project considered the possible vacation of <br />I-1amline Avenue between Ingerson Avenue and Tiller Lane. He indicated that this was the <br />poorest stretch of street in the neighborhood. Additionally, this portion of Hamline Avenue runs <br />adjacent to a wetland and reconstruction of this street would be more costly than any of the other <br />streets. Additionally, there are no accessible properties on this portion ofI-lamline Avenue. <br />