CC 03-27-2000 (2) - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - MARCH 27, 2000 4 B. Planning Case #00-14, Chuck Mertensotto, Corner Side Yard Variance (Continued from March 13th meeting) . Ms. Randall explained that the applicant was requesting approval of a comer side yard setback variance (7 feet proposed, when 40 teet is required) for a porch addition on a single family lot zoned R-2. Ms. Randall noted that this request had been tabled at the last Council meeting for further review, and the applicant had been requested to provide additional information. She added that Mr. Mertensotto was in attendance at the meeting, and had provided additional drawings for the Council's review. Ms. Randall stated the proposed modifications lessen the setback amount. She noted there had been some concern with regard to the closeness of the structure to the boulevard. She added there are currently footings from a previous structure on the front of the home near the front door, and the applicant is proposing a patio area 9 feet in length with no roof. Mr. Mertensotto stated he had received the drawings from his architect that morning. He added that he is not satisfied with the drawings as they do not define the entrance to the house, which is what he wishes to accomplish. . Mr. Mertensotto stated there are also some existing footings on the north side of the horne, but noted he wishes to complete the east side before moving on. He added he wants to extend the look of the patio around the home to the north. He asked whether he would need to obtain approval for the architectural style, or just the parameters. He also asked whether another variance would be required to extend the patio around the corner of the home. Ms. Randall stated, in most cases, a home could be embellished easily. She added that since this home docs not meet buildable area requirements, such limitations do not apply, and Council approval would be required. Acting Mayor Larson asked whether thc applicant was hoping for the Council's action on the proposed drawings. Mr. Mertensotto stated he would wish to know whether the Council will allow him to build the patio. He added he is paying the architect which creates some issues for him. He expressed concern that he has not shown the drawings to the tenants or neighbors, and whether he would be obliged to build the patio exactly as drawn. He asked whether approval could be given for something with certain dimensions within a specified area. Ms. Randall stated the Council's practice has always been to approve only clear-cut plans. Councilmember Larson stated he would wish to encourage the applicant to improve the home and make it more attractive, due to its prominent position within the City. He expressed his difficulty in voting for plans which are not finalized. . Mr. Mertensotto stated he wishes to obtain ideas and parameters from the Council. He added he wishes to do something functional to tlle home which will be aesthetically pleasing. He asked how much time he would have to present final plans to the Council.