My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 05-08-2000
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
CC 05-08-2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:11:30 PM
Creation date
11/9/2006 2:05:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - MAY 8, 2000 <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />MOTION: <br /> <br />Councilmember Aplikowski moved and Councilmember Rem seconded a motion <br />to approve the meeting minutes, as amended. The motion carried unanimously <br />(5-0). <br /> <br />CONSENT CALENDAR <br /> <br />A. Claims and Payroll <br />B. Change to Summer Hours <br />C. Web Site Development Task Force, Appointment of Members <br /> <br />MOTION: <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson moved and Councilmember Grant seconded a motion to <br />approve the Consent Calendar and authorize execution of all necessary documents <br />contained therein. The motion carried unanimously (5-0). <br /> <br />PUBLIC COMMENTS <br /> <br />Mayor Probst invited those present to come forward and address the Council on any items not <br />already on the agenda. <br /> <br />David Carlson, 3136 Ridgewood Road, stated he lives near Lake Johanna and was concerned <br />recently when a neighbor informed him that he was selling his home to someone who intended to <br />turn it into a dormitory for 8-10 college students. He added there is apparently nothing in City <br />ordinance which prohibits unrelated adults from occupying the same house. He requested that <br />the Council consider tightening the zoning laws to prevent this from happening to other <br />residents. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst stated this same situation had occurred with a home in his neighborhood, and he <br />agreed the ordinance does not address this issue. He added the issue was identified as a concern <br />for the City, although he was not sure whether the Planning Commission had taken it up. He <br />expressed concern that a change to the ordinance could not be enacted quickly enough to address <br />the home in question. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst stated that the Planning Commission might have the opportunity to review the <br />situation during the permitting process if modifications to the home are proposed. He added, <br />however, that case law does not permit the City to identity the number of unrelated people that <br />can occupy a single family home. <br /> <br />Mr. Carlson stated the zoning ordinance in Roseville is very descriptive and allows only 4 <br />unrelated occupants in a home in R-I zoning. He asked where the line is drawn between <br />residential and commercial rental properties. Mayor Probst stated that any resident can build a <br />home in an R -I district and then rent it. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst stated he would recommend that the issue be raised by the Planning Commission <br />as soon as possible. He reiterated that the current situation may not be prevented. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.