My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 05-30-2000 (2)
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
CC 05-30-2000 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:11:30 PM
Creation date
11/9/2006 2:05:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - MAY 30, 2000 <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />D. <br /> <br />Pay Estimate #8 (Final). Lametti & Sons, Inc., Gateway Business District, <br />Fourteenth Street NE <br /> <br />Mr. Brown stated that the Gateway District project was completed in fall 1998, although some <br />outstanding road surfacing items were not remedied by the contractor until spring 2000. He <br />added that this final payment reflects release of the retainage on the project. He recommended <br />that the Council approve the final payment, Pay Estimate #8, in tbe amount of $25,710.11 to <br />Lametti & Sons, Inc. <br /> <br />Acting Mayor Larson asked whether 5% retainage is sufficient incentive for contractors to <br />complete construction projects in a timely manner. Mr. Brown stated that 5% retainage is <br />usually sufficient for small contractors, He noted that large contractors are often quicker and <br />more reliable, although retainage is not as imperative for them. He added that state projects do <br />not hold any retainage. <br /> <br />Acting Mayor Larson asked whether the contractor is aware of the retainage during the bid <br />process, and whether other cities hold more than 5% retainage. Mr, Brown stated the contractor <br />is always aware of the retainage. Mr. Post noted that the contractor must post a performance <br />bond that can only be released upon completion of the construction project. He added this is an <br />additional incentive for the contractor to get the job completed in a timely manner. <br /> <br />MOTION: <br /> <br />Councilmember Aplikowski moved and Councilmember Rem seconded a motion <br />to approve final payment of Pay Estimate #8 in the amount of $25,710.1 I to <br />Lametti & Sons, Inc., upon receipt of final papers. The motion carried <br />unanimously (4-0), <br /> <br />E. Mounds View Senior High School Construction Manager, Stahl Construction <br />Company, Gregg A. Johnson, Project Manager; Time Extension Request from State <br />Fire Suppression Requirements <br /> <br />Acting Mayor Larson welcomed Gregg Johnson, Stahl Construction's Project Manager for the <br />Mounds View Senior High School Construction project. <br /> <br />Councilmember Rem stated that the time extension request appears to be a procedural issue, <br />noting that Staff has not indicated any problems with the request as presented. <br /> <br />Acting Mayor Larson asked why the City of Arden Hills, as well as Shoreview and North Oaks. <br />is being asked to take such an action. Mr. Johnson stated that the State Fire Marshall requires <br />that the local municipalities be in agreement with regard to the time extension request. <br /> <br />Acting Mayor Larson noted that City staff had recommended tbat the Council defers taking any <br />action on this issue, and asked whether this would be an impediment to completion of the <br />construction project. Mr. Johnson stated that a deferral would impede construction. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.