My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 05-30-2000 (2)
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
CC 05-30-2000 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:11:30 PM
Creation date
11/9/2006 2:05:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - MAY 30, 2000 <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br />Mayor Probst noted that the issue would be tabled until the Council's June 12 regular meeting. <br /> <br />F. <br /> <br />Planning Cases <br /> <br />1. Case #00-22, FairIsaac, 4285 Lexington Avenue (SUP Amendment) <br /> <br />Ms. Chaput explained that the applicant requests approval of an amendment to their Special Use <br />Permit (SUP) for an additional monument sign at the front of their building along the existing <br />private drive, The current sign does not adequately mark the property and, since the street is not <br />marked, there is insufficient signage to direct traffic to the facility, <br /> <br />The SUP on this property, approved in 1996, was originally intended for Control Data. Since <br />this time, the property has been divided up and Fair Isaac is only a portion of property and the <br />approved master plan, The overall plan allowed for signage along Lexington Avenue at the same <br />level as it existed in 1996. This limited the property to one pylon sign at that location for Control <br />Data. <br /> <br />Fair Isaac currently has a pylon sign along Lexington Avenue, directing traffic to its facility, <br />This sign rests on the comer of Lexington and a private drive, The facility faces the private <br />drive. Therefore, the applicant wishes to put up a sign in front of the building so that its location <br />is more recognizable. The sign ordinance allows for one freestanding sign for each frontage <br />along a public street. Although this is not a public street, it was evaluated according to that <br />standard. There are at least two frontages along this street, allowing for at least two freestanding <br />signs. <br /> <br />The proposed sign meets the square footage and height requirements of the code. The setbacks <br />were not required to be met since the sign is not being located along a public right-of-way. <br /> <br />Ms, Chaput stated that the Planning Commission recommends approval of Planning Case 00-22, <br />amendment to the Special Use Permit for Fair Isaac, with 3 conditions. <br /> <br />MOTION: <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson moved and Councilmember Aplikowski seconded a <br />motion to approve Planning Case #00-22, amendment to the Special Use Permit <br />for Fair Isaac, subject to the following conditions: <br /> <br />1. Compliance with the freestanding sign requirements of the sign ordinance <br />so that the sign not exceed a maximum of 100 square feet in area. <br />2. Compliance with the freestanding sign requirements of the sign ordinance <br />so that the sign not exceed a maximum of 16 feet in height. <br />3. Any lighting proposed for future signs meets the illumination <br />requirements in the sign ordinance. <br /> <br />The motion carried unanimously (5-0). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.