Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> ARDEN HILLS eITY eOUNeIL WORKSESSION - SEPTEMBER 18, 2000 5 <br /> . Proposed Amendments to Antenna Section of Zoninl! Ordinanee <br /> Mayor Probst, before discussion began, noted that he was concerned that not all <br /> parts of the antenna section, nor all concerns, had been addressed but that focus <br /> had been specifically provided on the City water tower sites. <br /> Planner Chaput explained that the City Council had passed a resolution delaying <br /> cellular or wireless companies from making application for location of antennas <br /> or related equipment on the water tower sites until such time that the City had <br /> decided how it was going to handle the proliferation of applications and the <br /> potential for overloading on the water tower sites. <br /> Planning Commission members agreed that the other parts of tile antemla <br /> ordinance did need to be addressed and they intended to do so in their work <br /> before the end of the calendar year 2000. Council agreed that the language that <br /> would be proposed to them at this time was acceptable, and that the Plmming <br /> Commission should address other issues through further changes in the antenna <br /> section. <br /> Potential Future Amendments and Work Proiects <br /> Chaput indicated that she would like to put together a proposed work plan for the <br /> Planning Commission, and have them review it, adopt it and present it to the City <br /> . Council so the City Council will be aware of the projects before the Planning <br /> Commission during the course of a calendar year. <br /> Council advised that the right-of-way ordinance that had been previously <br /> discussed during the course of the cable discussion should be a priority work item <br /> for them to consider, and pass along a recommendation to the City Council, prior <br /> to a second or third competitive cable franchise being awarded. <br /> Councilmember Aplikowski brought up the memorandum that Planner Chaput <br /> had passed along regarding banners for the Fiftieth Anniversary celebration. <br /> Councilmembers discussed that fact that there were exceptions and exemptions <br /> that may apply to special civic events, but did direct that the Planning <br /> Commission take a look at that part of the Sign Ordinance, to ensure the City's <br /> consistency in its application and allowances for banners. A third item that the <br /> City Council mentioned was the housing maintenance code, in conjunction with <br /> the 1-35W Corridor Coalition, and potential individual changes to that proposal. <br /> The last item Planner Chaput brought up was addressing the fact that, although <br /> the Neighborhood Business District Zone had been established on a map, no <br /> language had been written around it and better defined. If it was the intention of <br /> the City Council to consider going ahead with and continuing these zones, work <br /> would need to be done almost immediately shoring up the written portions of the <br /> Neighborhood Business District Zone. <br /> . I <br />