My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 09-25-2000
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
CC 09-25-2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:11:32 PM
Creation date
11/9/2006 2:05:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - SEPTEMBER 25,2000 <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />the district and not be allowed to deteriorate, He asked whether the screening approval could be <br />deferred to staff <br /> <br />Mr. Lynch stated that the Council had detem1ined in a past planning case which items could be <br />subject to staff approval in the future, He added that it might be inconsistent with that decision <br />to allow staff approval in different applications, <br /> <br />Councilmember Aplikowski stated that the Council could be specific with regard to the required <br />screening, adding that nothing would be allowed by staff which was not contained in the <br />approval, <br /> <br />MOTION: <br /> <br />Councilmember Aplikowski moved and Councilmember Grant seconded a motion <br />to approve Planning Case #00-31, Planned Unit Development Amendment for <br />1887 Gateway Boulevard for the addition of a make-up air unit and chiller <br />condenser, as shown in the applicant's submittal, with the following conditions: <br /> <br />L <br /> <br />Screening of the make-up air unit and chiller condenser, as well as those <br />units approved in Planning Case #00-17a, must be constructed of opaque <br />colored webbed fencing (materials as agreed on with staff) of a color to <br />match the building and built to a height equal to the equipment being <br />screened, <br />Application for a building permit must be made, meeting all building and <br />fire code regulations, <br /> <br />2, <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The motion carried unanimously (4-0), <br /> <br />2. Case #00-32, MA Peterson Design Build, 1228 Karth Lake Drive, Variance from <br />OHW Setback <br /> <br />Ms, Chaput explained that the applicant is requesting a variance from the ordinary high water <br />mark setback of Karth Lake (69 feet proposed, when 75 feet is required) for the removal of an <br />existing screen porch and deck and the construction of a smaller screen porch with stairs and an <br />addition to the single family home, zoned R-L <br /> <br />The proposed construction of the screen porch with stairs and addition to the home actually <br />decreases the current area of the house by 162 square feet The addition onto the house is an <br />additional 229 square feet However, the size of the deck and steps decreases by 172 square feet <br />and the patio area decreases by 219 square feel. Overall, the construction reduces the footprint of <br />the house, <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The setback, determined by the DNR and adopted by the City, from the ordinary high water mark <br />ofKarth Lake (934,95) is 75', It appears that a number of homes along Karth Lake are unable to <br />meet this setback as they currently exist Minnesota Rules 6120.3200 states that lakes classified <br />as "general development" (Karth Lake) should have a structure setback of 75' from the ordinary <br />high water level for unsewered lots and 50' for sewered lots, Current City code states the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.