Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - SEPTEMBER 25, 2000 <br /> <br />8 <br /> <br />2, More than one person not residing in the residence is employed to assist in the business <br />activity; and <br />3, The business in not permitted to have more than two vehicles on-site, in addition to those <br />required by the residents, on a daily basis and this limitation is exceeded, <br /> <br />Ms, Chaput stated that City Attorney Jerry Filla suggested that ifthe Council took action on the <br />Planning Commission's recommendation, it would be acceptable for the City to terminate the <br />business and require immediate relocation, allowing two weeks by letter. She added that an <br />inspection could be made after two weeks and a citation issued if necessary. <br /> <br />Councilmember Aplikowski stated the issue of the permissible number of cars parked in a <br />driveway was discussed recently, She added that the number of cars parked in the applicant's <br />driveway could not be approved, She noted it would be unreasonable to expect the applicant to <br />find alternative parking, <br /> <br />Councilmember Rem stated she had been in attendance at the recent Planning Commission at <br />which this case was discussed, She added that the applicant had commented that she was aware <br />of the fact that her business had outgrown the site and was willing to look at other options, She <br />noted that a two-week notice to terminate her home business is umeasonablc, <br /> <br />Ms, Chaput stated that a two-week notice was the City Attorney's recommendation and not a <br />requirement She added the City typically sends a letter and inspects after ten days, <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant stated the business has grown outside the bounds of a Class IT home <br />occupation as the nature of the business requires people and vehicles on site, He agreed that <br />relocation might take some time and the City should be lenient in its requirements, <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant asked for clarification with regard to a citation, Ms, Chaput stated a <br />criminal complaint would go to court to determine a fine of up to $700, while a civil complaint <br />would result in a lawsuit <br /> <br />Ms, Gulsvig stated she has begun a search for a new location for her business with much <br />difficulty, She added the Planning Commission had indicated that she would be given six <br />months to a year, and two weeks would be impossible, She noted she can rent space for the <br />vehicles on New Brighton Road, but employees will continue to come to the horne, <br /> <br />Mayor Probst expressed his interest in avoiding the creation ofundue hardship for the applicant <br />Mr. Lynch stated the City typically gives ten days for cessation of illegal activity, He added, in <br />this case, it might be appropriate for the applicant to contact City staff by that deadline to <br />establish a time frame for the business to be moved, <br /> <br />Councilmember Rem stated that this course of action would be preferable and reasonable, <br />Councilmember Aplikowski stated she would favor a 30-day time limit for the applicant to find a <br />new location or provide a proposal to staff Councilmember Grant stated that a 30-day time limit <br />is reasonable, <br />