Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - October 10,2000 3 <br /> MOTION: Councilmember Grant moved and Councilmember Aplikowski seconded a motion <br /> . to approve the Consent Calendar and authorize execution of all necessary <br /> documents contained therein, with the following amendment: <br /> Item E. The addition of Ray Krepps to the list of election judges for the general <br /> election. <br /> The motion carried unanimously (5-0). <br /> PUBLIC COMMENTS <br /> Mayor Probst invited those present to come forward and address the Council on any items not <br /> already on the agenda. <br /> There were no public comments, <br /> UNFINISHED AND NEW BUSINESS <br /> A. Resolution #00-34, Receiving a Revised Feasibility Report in the Matter of the 2001 <br /> Street Improvement Project <br /> Mr. Stafford stated that the Council had requested a revised feasibility report from the City <br /> . Engineer with regard to the 2001 Street Improvement Project following recommendations from <br /> Staff, the Lake Josephine Hills Association and the Ingerson Neighborhood Review Group. He <br /> added the revised report contains a basic outline of proposed costs, <br /> Mr. Stafford stated that staff recommends the Council's approval of Resolution #00-34 which <br /> receives the revised report and schedules a public hearing to be held November 13, 2000. He <br /> added that the public hearing will be an opportunity for the Council to receive comments from <br /> residents and discuss the merits of the project. He noted that Mr. Brown was available at the <br /> meeting for comments or questions. <br /> Mayor Probst reiterated that this item is not a public hearing and the Council will not receive <br /> public comments in this matter. He added the Council will decide whether or not to receive the <br /> feasibility report and whether to schedule a public hearing. He noted this will give the Council <br /> an opportunity to review the report and offer comments. <br /> Councilmember Grant asked why the contingency amount was changed from 10% to 15%. Mr. <br /> Brown stated the rate was adjusted to account for inflation rather than increasing unit prices on <br /> all individual items. <br /> Councilmember Grant stated he would prefer that individual prices be adjusted to reflect the <br /> increases that apply to them. He added it is more appropriate to increase illlit prices than to <br /> increase the contingency fee, Mr. Brown concurred. <br /> . <br />