Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - NOVEMBER 27,2000 2 <br /> the sentence wherc Councilmember Rem states "inclusion of sales tax exemption and <br /> . Metropolitan Council authority as a priority item". <br /> Councilmember Larson requested the following change: on page 4 of the October 30, Regular <br /> Council Meeting minutes, in the motion replace the" following reasons" with the "following <br /> conditions". <br /> Councilmember Larson stated he was confused about page 9 of the October 30 Regular Council <br /> meeting minutes in that he remembered taking action with regard to the Association of <br /> Metropolitan Municipalities Policies, but that the Council agreed to leave off one policy which <br /> was not acted on, <br /> Mayor Probst concurred and stated in the minutes the last paragraph of page 9, which continues <br /> on page 10, should be amended to reflect that point. <br /> Councilmember Larson stated the October 30, Regular Council Meeting minutes should be <br /> changed as follows: on page 12, fourth paragraph from the bottom, "1.5 million in unrestricted <br /> net assets" should be replaced with "1,5 million in equipment replacement funds under the <br /> gcneral category of unrestricted assets", <br /> Councilmember Larson requested the following changes: on page 12 of the October 30 Regular <br /> Council Meeting minutes, in the first line of the second paragraph from the bottom of the page, <br /> . replace "interested" with "interest". <br /> Councilmember Rem stated the Closed Executive Session was held in the conference room and <br /> not in the City Council chambers. <br /> Mayor Probst stated he had the same comments as Councilmember Larson on pages 9 and 10 of <br /> the October 30, Regular Council Meeting minutes. He suggested deleting the last paragraph on <br /> page 9 and correcting the first paragraph on page 10 to reflect Councilmember Larson's <br /> comments. <br /> Councilmember Larson asked if the Council goes into a closed session and then reconvenes in <br /> open session as stated on page 13 of the October 30 minutes, does the Council have some <br /> responsibility to state that they took no action in the closed session, He noted in his previous <br /> experience if an action was taken that could be reported than it was reported, Mr. Filla stated it <br /> depends what has been discussed in the session, <br /> Mr. Lynch stated it was a closed session to discuss litigation, <br /> Mayor Probst asked if the Council needs to state why it went into a closed session, Mr. Filla <br /> stated the minutes should reflect the Council went into closed session to discuss litigation in <br /> court files related to the Lake Josephine and the Vaughan Tower litigation, He noted beyond that <br /> . they do not have to say what was discussed and whether or not they took action. He added there <br /> are some provisions under the open meeting laws, which may require them to make minutes or <br /> tapes public after the litigation is over. <br />