Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – December 4, 2024 9 <br /> <br /> <br />Chair Weber indicated another way to address the planting needs would be to plant larger trees <br />on the multi-family housing lot, instead of planting 2” trees on the subject property. <br /> <br />Mr. Fink commented he would like to further investigate what size caliper trees were being <br />proposed. <br /> <br />Commissioner Collins addressed Attachment J and asked if the development intention has <br />changed since the traffic study was completed. He stated he was surprised by the low trip <br />generation from the proposed housing development. <br /> <br />Mr. Fink reported an age restricted housing development was proposed which led to the low trip <br />generation. <br /> <br />Commissioner Mitchell inquired if the residential dedication was tied to an expense for the <br />City. <br /> <br />Consultant Planner Hofer stated the proposed fee was tied to utility improvements, such as <br />streets, roads, etc. He commented if a CUP or PUD is required, the dedication payment can be <br />determined as a result of the increased demand on park land or park improvements. He reported <br />this meant the City had to consider how this development will impact demand for the public <br />facilities in the community. <br /> <br />Commissioner Mitchell discussed how part of affordable housing was to keep overall <br />construction costs down. She anticipated if the dedication fees were lower, this would assist with <br />providing more affordable housing units. She indicated this land has access to roads and parking. <br />She hoped because these expenses do not apply that the City could keep the residential <br />dedication lower in order to make the units more affordable. <br /> <br />Consultant Planner Hofer stated it was relevant to consider minimum needs for parks, trails <br />and wetlands for the subject development and what the City would be responsible for <br />maintaining long-term. <br /> <br />Chair Weber commented this also involves connection to and use of City utilities. <br /> <br />Mr. Fink indicated the tabling by the City Council for the rezoning occurred because the <br />Council was uncertain with how the project would move forward. He explained the City Council <br />was apprehensive about the number of units that would be included in this project and for that <br />reason, tabled the rezoning. <br /> <br />Chair Weber opened the public hearing at 8:03 p.m. <br /> <br />Chair Weber invited anyone for or against the application to come forward and make comment. <br /> <br />There being no comment Chair Weber closed the public hearing at 8:04 p.m. <br /> <br />Councilmember Rousseau discussed the City’s fee schedule and asked when was the last time <br />the City updated its park dedication fees. <br /> <br />Interim City Administrator Jagoe reported this was last done in approx. 2015/2016.