Laserfiche WebLink
<br />--- __u___ _ <br />. <br /> Village Council ~1i nutes -2- Dec. 11,1972 <br /> Motion was made by Herrick, seconded by Olmen, that, under the cir- <br /> cumstances, the Council determlne~ to leave the assessments against <br /> the Chvestulk property as levied; m,otlon carried unanllnously. <br /> REPORT OF ATTORNEY VINCENT P. COURTNEY <br /> Ordinance Aoprovals - UtilIty Rates <br /> The ordinance listed below were read In their entirety by Attorney <br /> Courtney. <br /> Motion was mad( by Henderson, seconded by Herrick, that the reading of <br /> AN ORDINANCE REL",HING TO -THE MUNICIPAL SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM. AMENDING <br />. ORDINANCES NOS. 49, 141 AND 153: PROVIDING A NEW BASIS FOR CALCULATING <br /> SEWER CHARGES ON NON-RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY. CHANGING BILLING OATES AND <br /> DELINQUENCY PROVISIONS AND PERMITTIHG REDUCTION OF RATES FOR SENIOR <br /> ~ITIZENS OR DISABLED. be considered a final reading, and that the <br /> ordinance be adopted 85 amended. Motion carried unanimously. <br /> Motion was made by Olmen, seconded by Henderson. that the reading of <br /> AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO THE MUNICIPAL WATER SYSTEM, AMENDING ORol- <br /> NANCE NOS. 103, 119. 142 AND 154 BY ESTABLISHING STANDBY CHARGES, <br /> CHANGING BILLING AND DELINQUENCY PROVISIONS. ALTERING HYDRANT CHARGE <br /> PROVJSIONS, AND PERMITTING WAIVER OF MINIMUM CHARGES FOR SENIOR CITIZENS <br /> AND DISABLED CITIZENS, be considered a final reading, and that tha <br /> ordinance be adopted as read. Motion carried unanimously. <br /> The Council asked tht Robert McNlesh and the Ad~lnlstratlve Office <br /> review the ordln.llnce drafts before publication. <br /> Mr, Henderson stated tll.at the reduction In rates to disabled persons <br /> should c1aarly mean heads of households who pay the utility bills, <br /> and not be construed ~o mean that a household Is eilolble for such <br /> rat. due to the fact that a disabled person lives at-the address. <br /> Attorney Courtney said the distinction can be clearly defined In the <br /> raso I ut I on to be passed by the Coune" on the matte r. <br /> Final Ph't - Bussard Addition <br /> Atty. Courtney re~l.wed a report by Atty, lunde~, dated December 8, <br /> 1972, and by Engineer Lund, dated October 21, /972. He detailed the <br /> following potnts regarding the plat: <br /> ( I ) It Is posslbj~ that the Rice Creek w~t.rshed District <br /> has authority to review and pass on plats abutting <br /> lakes within the District. <br /> (2 ) Ramsey County has passed a resolution. which prOhibits <br /> an increase to drainage of water and/or pollutants Into <br /> county ~akes as a result of new ~Iat development. <br /> (3) There Is a title problem regarding the plat. Mr. Bussard <br /> I s aware of It. <br /> Atty. Courtney to continue to work on details concerning theplat. <br />. Gray fox Road and Dunlap Street <br /> Atty. Courtney reported that Atty. Daubney Is working out a title <br /> question regarding the dedication. We s>>ould be ready to accept the <br /> streets In about a week. <br /> Model~AC CharQes OrdInance <br /> Motl~n was made by Henderosn, seconded by Olmen. that ~N ORDJNANCE <br /> ESTABLISHING SEWER SERVICES AVAILABiLITY AND CONNECTION CHARGES TO <br /> PAY RESERVE CAPACITY COSTS Of METROPOLITAN SEWER BOARD, be Introduced <br /> by title. Motion carrIed unanimously. <br /> The Council determlned"that permIts on large PUO's should be withheld <br /> untl I SAC charges ere paid, and that such charges would probably be <br /> considered by the developer as part of his overall finance plan. <br /> -2- -_._~ <br />