CC 08-14-1972 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Counci I Mee"tine Minutes Page i"wo - August ~4. 1972 Mr. Par~rldgB was Informed th~t tha Village Building ~nspector would bs authorized to Issue lndlyldua~ bul~dlng permits within the concept O'{ tho special use permit. If such use permit Is given Councl! approvaij. Mr. PartridgEl stated he felt he could meet the requirements of the August B memo within ]0 days. Coune! iman Hoi leohorst stated that granting a special use permit, subject to Mr. Partridge completing ail the requirements listed In Mr. Shetier's memo of August 8. !972, pJus satisfying the requests of the Parks and' Recreation Committee, would not, In bls opinion, offer any more to Mr. Partridge than the conceptual approvaij previously granted. . He stated, however, that he had received a cali from a First Natlona~ Bank spokesman, ~t Partrldgeis raquest, who said that a conceptual approva~ has 110 ~tlaning to the "banking community", but tlley do recog- nize a special Mse permit, even though It Is subject to numerous relltrlctlollS and provisions. Councilman Hal !enliorst edso discussed the exchisiolls which MI'. Pllrfrldge requested to Mr. Shetler's, memo of August e. Rega,'!!ill!! tha construction of the community recreation building, he st~ted that he felt the Village could go along with permitting construction at the boglnnlng of Phase 3, as outlined In Mr. MuriowSkl's ij.tter af July 26, 1972. Reg~rding the requGst tor blanket approval topGrm!t the condomlnl~rns to be on a rent Gr buy basi,S, .119 fl!li'i" that this I'.'ou~d not be In the. best Interest ot""the Village, but thllt perhilllls SOilla combll1llltlonof buyl>>eese couid be worked out ! ater. Hn view of thes..tatements, and llUthough he would hove pr$ferred that, the matter bi1l ha,ild~8d in the conventlonai l'IlaVl110r, Counc! Uman Hol Uen- hor.' stated tb.t he was willing to t.ke the unprecedented step of mOiling that a spaclaU use permit Ill\) approved for the proposed Ralnbolli HIi 15 project, Case No. 7!-26. subject ta the following conditions: I. That the approval bo limited to a 60-dllY period, commencing August 85. 1972, ~ndlng October 13, !972; during whlcb time the developer shall comply wIth all the requirements specified In the VII lege P~8nner's repo~t of August 8, 1972, !ncludlng satisfactow')' conclusion of negotiations with tile Parks and Rec~eation Committee; submitting to the Planning Commission, and obtaining approva~ by the Council, of alO documents re- quired In that report, prior ta being allowed the 'ssuance of building permits and commencing construction. 2. That the community recreation bu!ldlng be built at the beginning of t~e third phase of d~veRopmant, as outlined In 14r. I>hll'lowski'$ !etter. 3. That the final pl~t need not b. filed before Issuance of bulld{ng permits as suggastac In Point No.8 of Mr. Shetler's mamo. Councilman Herrick s?~ted that he is ag~ln~t setting a precedent for future de~910pers by the mov~, end ho fee~s the CouncIl wl~i be subject to num$rOUS future probUems If V!liege raQulrGm~nts e~d proceduros are not strlctlv fo;lo~9d. Vote on the motion: Ayes - Cr0pee~, Ho~ ~enhorst. O~mGn. No - Herrick Abmtalned - Henderson . Motloll Clu'r loll. COl!lDlalnts Mr~ H;rbeFt Blorsach, 3362 L~kG Johanna BOMlavard, complainsd about the condition of a ha~.e north af Lake Lane .t Noble Road end Jobanna Boulevord. He ~tated the houso was burn8d or guttod in December 1971. a~d is now h~zardDUS to childre~ end Is a. eY8sor0. Mayor Crepoau rGport~d It ~as s~a~0~ by the Sui Idi~g In$poctor', but has been broken lllto. Mr. E~r~ Gray. ~a25 lake la~e. reported 8 sGcond cabin or oUd house located in tha sam6 vlcinlt" p!us t~~ shoos thet sre unsightly and rllt Infested. Th3 illilltt95" was ,'.hH-red to tlttor,~av Lvnden. C ij ark I\dOl1lnl stratal" InlS as~~d to obtain tho addressos Tor th~ t~o propertlGs snd give to Mr. Lynden. Bnd ta have SOmBGnO check ta ... If tha properties have municipal SE~"tQ;Y $~we; and water iscl~itlss. ..2-