My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 01-04-1999
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
CC 01-04-1999
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:11:37 PM
Creation date
11/9/2006 2:38:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - JANUARY 4, 1999 <br /> <br />9 <br /> <br />Mayor Probst stated that rather than taking a preemptive action to do a moratorium he would feel <br />more comfortable with this issue ifhe knew the actual status in order for the Council to attempt <br />to take a more informed decision on what would be the appropriate action. He stated that <br />although there is the possibility of the application coming in prior to the Council taking a formal <br />action he would hope that, by having this conversation on record, the Council has demonstrated <br />its concerned interest. If the Council would choose to take the path of a moratorium, perhaps as <br />early as January 25, 1999, and an application came in before that time, he would not feel <br />comfortable with the Council's position had action been taken subsequent to this discussion. <br /> <br />Mr. Fritsinger suggested that Staff could speak with the City Attorney and gather some <br />information for the W orksession next week. He stated that prior to the W orksession Staff will <br />have met with the tower representatives one more time and there may be additional information <br />available at that time. Staff would also provide information trom the zoning ordnance at the <br />Worksession. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst asked if it would be possible to gather information from Shoreview regarding the <br />height of their tower, how much space is actually required, and any problems they may have <br />encountered. Mr. Fritsinger stated he will try to have City Attorney Filla attend the Worksession <br />next week. He indicated that Mr. Filla has been working with Shoreview as the City Attorney <br />for quite a while and he is familiar with the agreements and problems they have experienced. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson indicated that, in reading through the information provided in past <br />meeting packets, there seems to be a great deal of difficulty in denying the construction of new <br />towers, even if there is a warranted reason to oppose it. He noted, however, that in a recent <br />meeting packet there had been legal material which indicated that some cities have successfully <br />fought towers. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson stated that his primary concern is recognizing that Arden Hills is an area <br />which is attractive because it is high and because of flight patterns. He wondered when the City <br />can say enough is enough. He noted that there are already six towers within the cities of Arden <br />Hills and Shoreview. <br /> <br />Mr. Ringwald stated that one thing to consider is what the opportunities would be to put other <br />antennas on the new tower to reduce the number of towers. Mr. Fritsinger noted that, in this <br />situation, the proposal would be to take some antennas used by MnDOT, the National Guard and <br />the City and put them all onto one tower. He indicated that, at this point, there is no indication of <br />how this may work. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson stated that one concern he had would be failure to take action in advance <br />of the application being submitted. If, at some point, the Council decides that moratorium would <br />be appropriate action, and the application had already been filed, it would be difficult to prevail. <br />He wondered if there is something more that could be done at this meeting, such as a formal <br />action to have Staff research what may be the implications of considering a moratorium. <br />Therefore, if the Council chose to take this route in future, the Council will have taken some sort <br />of action which leaves the option open, without saying what the Council will or wants to do. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.