My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-10-25-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2020-2029
>
2025
>
02-10-25-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2025 8:48:35 AM
Creation date
3/11/2025 8:48:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—FEBRUARY 10, 2025 7 <br /> City Administrator Jagoe stated the condition could be worded in such a manner that if the <br /> property owner did not consent, it satisfies the condition so staff could move forward and issue <br /> permits. <br /> Councilmember Monson indicated she did not support holding this item up, but she also wanted <br /> to see if there was a way forward for the sign easement. <br /> Mayor Grant supported the Council having a conversation with the property owner in order to <br /> receive the easement. He stated the applicant was asking for signage and the City, as part of the <br /> PUD amendment was asking for a sign easement. <br /> Mr. Ferarro commented he was not requesting branded signage but rather was requesting <br /> wayfinding signage. <br /> Mayor Grant commented he would be in favor of tabling action on this item, or having approval <br /> being contingent upon meeting a condition to receive an easement. <br /> Councilmember Holden suggested this item be tabled to the February 19 Special City Council <br /> meeting. <br /> Mayor Grant supported this recommendation. <br /> Councilmember Weber inquired if the City would deny the sign request if the applicant were to <br /> not allow for the sign easement. <br /> Councilmember Holden explained she could not speculate how people would vote in the future. <br /> Councilmember Monson indicated she would not deny the request for lack of an easement. <br /> Councilmember Weber stated he did not believe this was an unreasonable discussion to have. <br /> He commented his personal opinion was that he would not hold this item up if the easement were <br /> not granted. <br /> Councilmember Rousseau inquired if the request were approved, would the applicant speak with <br /> the owner in good faith about the sign easement. <br /> Mr. Ferarro stated he could do this. <br /> Councilmember Monson indicated if the applicant were to say no at this time, there may be an <br /> opportunity for a partnership in the future. She reviewed a proposed condition that could be made <br /> a part of the motion to read: The applicant shall work with City staff to identify a location for an <br /> easement in favor of the City for the purpose of a gateway sign, or combined signs. She <br /> commented she was trying to find a way forward in order to not hold this item up. <br /> Mayor Grant reported if a condition were added, the condition would have to be met before the <br /> requested CPC/Delkor signs could go up. <br /> City Administrator Jagoe reported this was the case. She explained if the applicant were to say <br /> they do not want to grant the City an easement, would this satisfy the condition because they had <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.