My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 04-26-1999
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
CC 04-26-1999
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:11:39 PM
Creation date
11/9/2006 2:38:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - APRIL 26,1999 <br /> <br />15 <br /> <br />Director's recommendation to proceed with the replacement of the City's residential water <br />meters at a total cost of approximately $500,000, spread over a two year period, <br /> <br />There are three types of reading devices that attach to meters, Remote Readers; Radio Readers; <br />and Phone Readers. The City currently has approximately 2,350 residential meters and <br />replacement costs are estimated at $250 per installed meter, using radio read meters. Staff would <br />not recommend the use of touch readers, as these would still require the physical reading of the <br />meters. <br /> <br />If Badger Meter provides the best proposal for the meter replacement, the City could realize <br />savings, as approximately ten percent of the City meters are new enough that only a radio read <br />upgrade would be needed. In this scenario, a conservative estimate for the replacement/upgrade <br />would be $570,000. Staff had included in the budget $250,000 for 1999 and $250,000 for the <br />year 2000 for the replacement/upgrade. Any new construction installations would be funded by <br />the meter permit fee, which is based on 120% of the City's actual costs as per code. <br /> <br />The installed cost to the City for radio read meters versus the remote read meters currently used <br />by the City, would be approximately $100 more per meter, or $235,000, Staff would point out <br />some of the anticipated benefits ofthe radio reading technology: <br /> <br />I. <br /> <br />Currently, it costs the City an average of240 man hours at $25.82 per hour, or $6,200 per <br />quarter to read the residential water meters. Staff estimates this time would be reduced to <br />16 man hours at $25.82 per hour, or $415 per quarter in savings of $5,800 per quarter. <br /> <br />This would also provide an estimated 224 man hours per quarter for Public Works <br />employees to perform higher skilled jobs that the City needs to accomplish, and is not <br />currently able to perform due to time and man power constraints. <br /> <br />2. Currently, during each quarterly reading process, approximately 40 meters are identified <br />for accuracy problems. These could consist of misreads; no readings or meters stopped; <br />damage to remote reader, etc. In each case, a return visit is required and, in many cases, <br />appointments need to be made to access the actual meter and verify the accuracy of the <br />remote reader. This often results in another 40 man hours per quarter for this effort. <br /> <br />3. The radio read system interrogates the meter directly, and does not go through a remote <br />mounted system. Thus, ifthe meter is operating, accuracy is not an issue, <br /> <br />4, The City performs an average of 12 final reads per month. Finals are required when <br />property ownership is transferred, on or close to the closing date. At the time of a final <br />read, an appointment is also needed to enter the residence and read the actual meter, as <br />often the meter and the remote reader are not in sync. If this is the case, the meter itself, <br />the remote reader, or both may need replacement. <br /> <br />With the older meters typically on the south end of town, the City would replace those meters <br />first. With approximately 50 percent ofthe City residences on each side of the Minneapolis/St. <br />Paul Sault Saint Marie Railroad, this would be the natural dividing line, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.