My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 05-10-1999
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
CC 05-10-1999
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:11:39 PM
Creation date
11/9/2006 2:38:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - MAY 10, 1999 <br /> <br />17 <br /> <br />Councilmember Malone stated that he did not like the idea of constructing a trail that may be <br />torn down in the future, particularly when the grant money may have to be paid back to the state. <br />Councilmember Aplikowski concurred. She asked if the proposed trail along Snelling Avenue <br />would be a candidate for the grant money. Mr. Fritsinger stated that the grant money could not <br />be applied to this trail area. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst stated that he respects the Parks and Recreation Committee's logic and belief that <br />it would be a long time before the trail would have to be removed. However, the City's Park <br />funds are so limited that, when funds are expended on a project such as the County Road F trail, <br />the City needs to know that it will have the trail for a number of years. He recommended that the <br />if Parks and Recreation Committee intends to construct a trail segment this year, they identify <br />another site to utilize the funds. <br /> <br />Mr. Fritsinger asked, if the money were not required to be paid back to the state, would this <br />change the Council's view point. Mayor Probst stated that it may to some extent. However, he <br />would not rely upon Ramsey County to replace the trail when County Road F is modified. lfthe <br />City had some ability to lock the County into an agreement to replace the trail he may be <br />supportive. He reiterated, however, that he would not rely upon the County replace the trail. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson stated that ifthis were the only place left within the City where a trail is <br />needed it would be a different situation. However, staff has identified so many other areas where <br />trails are planned, there are other places where the money could be better spent. <br /> <br />Councilmember Rem stated that the Parks and Recreation Committee had felt strongly about the <br />amount of pedestrian traffic in the area and the need for the County Road F trail. Since many <br />other Minnesota Department of Transportation projects have been put off in the past, the Parks <br />and Recreation Committee believed that the City would have use of the trail for as long as 10 <br />years. <br /> <br />Councilmember Malone stated that the Minnesota Department of Transportation would move <br />forward with the 1-694 improvements soon and this will undoubtedly affect the County Road F <br />trail. He stated that another area should be found for use of the trail money. <br /> <br />MOTION: <br /> <br />Councilmember Malonc moved and Councilmember Larson seconded a motion to <br />direct staff to find an alternate use of the City's trail money and the Minnesota <br />Department of Natural Resources grant money, or to inform the Minnesota <br />Department of Natural Resources that the grant money will not be used. The <br />motion carried unanimously (5-0). <br /> <br />ADMINISTRATOR COMMENTS <br /> <br />Mr. Fritsinger stated that included in the bench handouts was a copy ofthe 1999 Budget Book. <br />He indicated that if the Council had any questions regarding the Budget Book to contact either <br />Mr. Post or himself. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.