Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - MAY 24, 1999 <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />I. <br /> <br />Applicant provide documentation for permanent easement for the parking lot for review <br />by the City Attorney, or provide proof of parking by joining this property with the <br />property to the north. <br />Provide erosion control in the area that will be disturbed. <br />Lighting meet the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance Section V,E,3,a,b,c, and d. <br />Rice Creek Watershed approval. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />2. <br />3. <br />4. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst asked for clarification that none of the parking issues would alleviate the need for <br />the structure parking proposed for buildings G and F. Ms. Randall confirmed this, stating the <br />ramps will become needed with further expansions. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst asked whether the issue of an additional stop sign on Fernwood Avenue should be <br />attached as a condition. Ms. Randall stated that this issue could be referred to the Finance and <br />Operations Committee. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst stated, with regard to the trail easement, it would appear this is the appropriate <br />time to bring the issue to a conclusion if the City believes this is the right location. Mr. <br />Fritsinger stated the road as constructed is not in the center of the right of way, and there is a <br />larger right of way on its south side. He added the question of getting the easement for the trail <br />is not relevant, as staff is unsurc whether it will be needed for road in the future. He added there <br />would be future opportunities to review this issue. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Mr. Ringwald stated that speculation with regard to future planning efforts on 1-694/Hamline <br />Avenue/County Road F is risky ffild many of the anticipated changes to these roadways have yet <br />to be designed. He added that staff concludes that this is not the appropriate time to pursue the <br />easements. <br /> <br />Councilmember Aplikowski asked how many people the applicant employs. Mr. Ringwald <br />stated there are approximately 2,000 employees on-site as well as 200-250 salespeople who are <br />not permanently affixed at that location. He added shifts run around the clock on the <br />manufacturing side of the business. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson asked for clarification with regard to the size of the proposed parking lot <br />across F ernwood A venue that appears to be smaller on the drawings than on the master plan. <br />Ms. Randall confirmed the parking is smaller on the site plan than that which is shown on the <br />Master Plan, the intent is that this parking lot could be expanded in the future to accommodate <br />some of the growth on the site. <br /> <br />MOTION: <br /> <br />Councilmember Malone moved and Councilmember Larson seconded a motion to <br />approve Planning Case #99-07, Master Plan/Planned Unit Development <br />amendment, subject to the following conditions: <br /> <br />I. <br /> <br />Applicant provide documentation for permanent easement for the parking <br />lot for review by the City Attorney, or provide proof of parking by joining <br />this property with the property to the north. <br />Provide erosion control in the area that will be disturbed. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />2. <br />