Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - JUNE 28, 1999 <br /> <br />13 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Ms. Diane Rushenburg, 3168 Shorelinc Lane, stated tl1at she has made a few calls to tl1e City in <br />order to gain an understanding of the casement and find out what her options are. She indicatcd <br />that she is not trying to hold up thc development and she is not being unrealistic. She felt that <br />she would be toolish to sign an agreement allowing access across hcr property without having a <br />full understanding of the situation and what hcr options are. <br /> <br />Ms. Jody Hilgers, 1532 Briarknoll Drive, stated that she came to the meeting to hear the proposal <br />regarding thc US Highway 10 and Highway 96 intersection. She indicated that she lives at the <br />southcast portion of this intcrsection and she was interested in the Council's strategy on how tl1e <br />Minnesota Dcpartment of Transportation's objective to handle the traffic volume on US <br />Highway 10 will affect the neighboring residential properties. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Ms. Hilgcrs agrecd witl1 Councilmember Malone's comment that perhaps the City should be <br />challenging thc Minnesota Department of Transportation to do something to improve tl1e <br />interchange at Highway 694 and 135-W. She was concerned by the comments that the Minncsota <br />Department of Transportation plans to do somcthing with the Highway 694 and US Highway 10 <br />interchange, however, no one really knows what these plans are. Consideration should bc given <br />to how much money the Minnesota Department of Transportation plans to spend on the Highway <br />694 and US Highway 10 interchange, the Highway 96 and US Highway 10 interchange, and the <br />Highway 96 and 135- W interchange. The City should take a look at why it would want to <br />encourage continued volumes of traffic through residential Arden Hills, which would decrease <br />property values, rathcr than challenging the Minnesota Department of Transportation to improve <br />thc Highway 694 and 135- W interchange. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst stated tl1at tl1is is what the City has been attempting to do. Within the <br />Transportation Improvement Program, thcre is a process by which projects must gct into this <br />program in order to be funded and scheduled for construction. The latest document indicates that <br />tl1e first work scheduled for the Ardcn Hills area is the Highway 694 overlay. All other projects <br />are more than 10 years out. The City has challenged the Minnesota Department of <br />Transportation to give the City some options; however, tl1e Minnesota Department of <br />Transportation has not looked at tl1is situation in this level of detail. The City took on some <br />advanccd engineering work to try to undcrstand what could happen. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst stated tl1at there is a lot more work which needs to be done, however, the City is <br />not convinced at tllis time that it wants to spend General Fund dollars for these projects. One <br />other vehicle which may providc help to the City of Arden Hills is thc I-35W Corridor Coalition <br />which is currently looking at l-35W and its related transportation issues. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst stated that tl1e people who are in tl1e most difficult position at this time are tl10se <br />residents in the Mobile Home Park who wcre told two years ago that they may lose their homes. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Councilmember Malone offered to provide Ms. Hilgers with a copy of the Transportation <br />Improvement Program for her to review. He noted that the problem with this program is tl1at, <br />according to Fcdcral regulations, the State cannot plan more than three ycars out. Since the <br />improvements in Arden Hills are beyond this limit, tl1ere is no formal plan for these projects. He <br />