Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - JUNE 28, 1999 <br /> <br />20 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson stated tl1at on page 2-1, Section 200.02, second sentence, the word <br />"formal" should be changed to "form." He noted that on the same page, in subparagraph 2, it <br />states, "The absentee ballot precinct shall be the precinct in which the City Hall of the City <br />serves as thc polling place for such precinct." He asked if this should state "in which tl1e City <br />Hall of the City is located..." He felt that the way the sentcncc is written it implies that there <br />would always be a precinct polling place at the City Hall. <br /> <br />Mr. Fritsinger statcd that at the last election, Ms. Stowell and he were tl1e absentee election <br />judges and they did all the counting at the City Hall. When the City Hall was moved, it was no <br />longer the polling placc for tl1e City, howcver, the City Hall did still maintain the absentee <br />voting. Witl1 the new City Hall, the assumption is that the City Hall will once again be the <br />polling place. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson stated that tl1e reason he had suggested changing thc wording was so it <br />would not force the City into a situation where the City Hall must be thc location for the absentee <br />ballot precinct. He stated that he had the same concern with regard to subparagraph 3 on page 2- <br />2. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson suggested that on page 2-8, Section 220.01, subparagraph I, tl1e <br />statement, "or othcr body of the City" should be added. Since the City is establishing new Task <br />Forces at this time, and tl1ere may be the need to establish otl1er such bodies, this change would <br />apply to tl1ese otl1er groups. He suggested the same addition be made in subparagraphs 2 and 3 <br />of the same Section after the word "commission." <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson stated that on page 2-10, subparagraph 2 refers to the human rights <br />commission and suggested that this entirc scction should be removed. Mr. Fritsinger stated tl1at <br />the City Council had already taken action to remove tl1is section of tl1e Code. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson stated that on page 2-14, subparagraph 5, he could not imagine what <br />"other officers" would nccd to bc appointed to the Plarming Commission. He suggested that this <br />language be removed. Mr. Fritsinger agreed. Councilmember Malone stated tl1at it might best to <br />leave this language in since it preserves the ability of the Planning Commission to appoint an <br />additional officer if necessary. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson stated that on page 2-16, paragraph 6 creates an appeal process, which <br />seems to be very different from any other type of appeal that can be taken. This appeal process <br />goes around the City Council and allows the Planning Commission to make the final decision. <br />He asked why tl1is is. Mr. Fritsinger stated that the final appeal always goes to the City Council. <br />He noted that the language in the section might be related to the old Board of Appeals. He <br />suggested deleting the entire paragraph. <br /> <br />tJ <br /> <br />On page 2-21, Section 230 - Civil Defense, Councilmcmber Larson stated that tl1e note indicates <br />that tl1e City may have forfeited its power to the County since committecs have never been <br />established. He suggested that, rather than having all the boiler plate information includcd in the <br />Code, which is geared more toward a war-fare situation than natural disaster, it should simply <br />authorize the Council to prepare a plan, as has been done, and refer to this plan. <br />