Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORKSESSION - JULY 19, 1999 6 <br /> . <br /> for an easement. Mr. Moore and Mr. Fritsinger had met with the property owners and tenants, <br /> and negotiations were continuing. <br /> Mr. Greg Brown, ofBRW, stated that as an alternate location for this 12' x 400' trail, his firm <br /> had approached U.S. Fish and Wildlife for possible trail location, but they didn't appear to be <br /> very receptive, and if the City needed to relocate the proposed trail, further negotiation with U.S. <br /> Fish & Wildlife would be required. <br /> Mr. Fritsinger stated that, to-date, the City had met all ofSeholl's requests, and that if necessary, <br /> it would be reasonable for the City to pay the Scholl's firm for this requested easement. <br /> It was the eonsensus that, due to delays, development of this trail extension would prove to be a <br /> 2000 expenditure, rather than a 1999 expenditure. <br /> Mr. Post also noted that, in the Park Maintenance Fund, staff had included installation costs by <br /> the manufacturer for all future playstructure replacements. <br /> General discussion items included realistic projected construction costs for the proposed <br /> maintenance facility and the options of leasing or building, or of prepaying the lease with capital; <br /> monument signs at the entrances to the City, or at City Hall; trees from TCAAP; and landscaping <br /> the intersection of Lexington Avenue and Highway 96 without signage. <br /> . Mr. Post stated that a Fund Balance cash flow analysis would be available at the next Council <br /> budget discussion. Staff was directed to proceed with the revised CIP, as reviewed with cash <br /> flow impacts, along with additional proposed operating budget information for the next budget <br /> mecting. <br /> Mr. Post provided a final review for several 2000 Budget operating issues including, Elections; <br /> projeeted Pay Plan administration, fire protection costs with the City assuming liability for <br /> capital eosts; Ramsey COW1ty Law Enforcement budget projections, projecting a 4 - 4.4% <br /> increase, possible alternatives related to level of poliee protection service and other Contract City <br /> Group concerns <br /> Mr. Post listed several other items that would impact the target of a "zero" percent levy limit <br /> target as earlier suggested by Councilmember Larson, including the recent addition of a shared <br /> Building Inspector position with the City of Shoreview, and the previously authorized addition of <br /> a y, time support position. <br /> Further discussion included the Council ehallenge for determining their philosophy; current <br /> building permit revenues; manpower hours in the Public Works Department and the requested <br /> public level of service; cost savings in infrastructure maintenance areas; and crisis management <br /> vs. plarmed maintenance. <br /> . <br />