My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-10-25-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2025
>
03-10-25-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 10:19:19 AM
Creation date
3/17/2025 10:16:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
418
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />Agenda / Discussion <br />Welcome and Project Review <br />- Kyle Karsjen, Tidal Basin Project Manager welcomed the group and asked attendees to <br />sign in via Teams Chat, leaving their name, title, jurisdiction, phone, and email. He <br />introduced himself and the team, and the attendees introduced themselves. The meeting <br />was recorded. <br />- Kyle reviewed the purpose for the plan update, explaining the importance of mitigation. <br />He then provided the plan update status; Task 1 – Project Initiation has been completed. <br />The team is in the process of Task 2 – Capabilities and Hazard Identification which will <br />be the focus of this meeting (Planning Meeting #2). The next meeting (Planning Meeting <br />#3) will focus on mitigation strategies. Once the plan is drafted, it will be provided to the <br />state and then FEMA for review and approval. <br />- After reviewing the participant requirements, Kyle reminded the attendees that each <br />jurisdiction will need to return their capability assessment and mitigation action status <br />worksheets, if they have not already done so. <br /> <br />Hazard Review <br />Kyle walked the group through a discussion about each of the identified hazards listed below, <br />including the understanding of the hazard, any updates to the hazard history since 2019, and <br />any local context to provide in the final plan. The HMP will include both a hazard analysis and <br />vulnerability assessment for each hazard. <br />Dam/Levee Failure <br />There are 5 identified dams in the county. <br />• Classification: 1 High Hazard, 1, Significant Hazard, and 4 Low Hazard. <br />• History: There is no history of dam failures/issues. <br />• Impacts: St. Anthony Falls and Coon Dam could have some impact to the county water <br />flow if they fail. <br />• Ongoing Strategies: Battle Creek and Ford dams are required to and have EAPs. St. <br />Paul has been involved in some planning efforts, but do not believe Battle Creek has <br />ever conducted an exercise. This dam is the responsibility of the watershed. <br />Drought <br />• History: There is some history of drought in the region. Previous droughts have caused <br />stoppage of passenger vessels and impacts to the port. <br />• Impacts: In addition, White Bear Lake’s levels can impact recreational and residential <br />used of the lake. There is an ongoing lawsuit regarding White Bear Lake. <br />• Ongoing Strategies: Many, if not most, jurisdictions have instituted an even/odd watering <br />schedule for residential use. Only the Governor can completely restrict water usage. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.