My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 09-13-1999
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
CC 09-13-1999
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:11:41 PM
Creation date
11/9/2006 2:39:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - SEPTEMBER 13,1999 <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />2000 General Fund expenditures will require an increase higher than that calculated by the <br />County net levy certification. Schedule three of the worksheet indicated a levy certification tax <br />rate of 18.33%. Upon calculating the proposed budgetary needs from the tax levy, staff had <br />concluded that the City of Arden Hills would require a higher local capacity tax rate of 18.98%. <br /> <br />Mr. Post advised that staff recommends the City Council approve Resolution #99-28, <br />Authorizing a tax rate increase for the 1999 Tax Levy, payable in 2000. If the recommended <br />increase was not approved, Ramsey County will hold to the 18.33% rate and not allow the City <br />to use the maximum levy that the State of Minnesota has authorized. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst stated that he had struggled to understand the fact that there was no connection <br />between this tax rate increase and the freeze on levies imposed by the State of Minnesota. <br />Additionally, this does not reflect whether or not the residents will experience a raise in taxes. <br />He indicated that he would support the proposed resolution. However, he was frustrated that this <br />sort of issue was continually added to the program and has nothing to do with the Truth in <br />Taxation process and does not convey information to the residents regarding what will be <br />happening with their taxes. <br /> <br />Counci1member Larson stated that he found it ironic that the State Legislature seeks to impose <br />limits on the cities and counties to live within certain means while the State does not have the <br />same requirements. He asked staff if the levy rate difference would be transferred to dollars and, <br />if so, how much money the increase resulted in. Mr. Post stated that the ditlerence in the levy <br />. rate would result in an increase of$61,772. <br /> <br />Councilmember Aplikowski asked why Ramsey County would not allow the tax levy increase. <br />Mr. Post stated that it was not a question of Ramsey County not allowing the increase. Rather, it <br />was simply a calculation that was mandated to be done by the County Auditor. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst noted that the levy would only be increased this year by $51,763, which was less <br />than the amount that the calculations indicated that the levy was over. <br /> <br />MOTION: <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson moved and Councilmember Aplikowski seconded a <br />motion to approve Resolution #99-28, Authorizing a tax rate increase for the 1999 <br />Tax Levy, payable in 2000. The motion carried unanimously (4-0). <br /> <br />B. Resolution #99-29, Clarifying Proposed Sums of Money to be Levied for Levy Year <br />1999, Payable in 2000 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Mr. Post explained that this item involved certifying a preliminary levy to Ramsey County. As <br />discussed with the City Council at the August 9,1999 Budget Review Session, the preliminary <br />2000 General Fund budget needs to utilize 100 percent of its available tax levy certification <br />amount from the Minnesota Department of Revenue to achieve a balanced budget condition. <br />Resolution #99-29 certifies on a proposed basis that the certified levy amount would be <br />$1,976,377. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.