Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - SEPTEMBER 13,1999 <br /> <br />22 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />communities. With all the issues surrounding the County Road I interchange, this project did <br />receive good support. One issue was, considering the amount of money it would take to move <br />forward, he did not believe the City of Arden Hills could take this project on its own. The <br />project will require the support of the Coalition to be successful. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson asked how the lack of a decision on the triangle site project would affect <br />moving forward with the Highway 96 reconstruction. He was concerned that the City may not <br />know the future status ofthe triangle site for a couple of years. Mayor Probst stated that progress <br />would not be made on these issues as quickly as he would hope. lIe believed that the Coalition <br />might pursue something within the next six months to one year. At this point the Coalition has a <br />real opportunity to move forward within the two years, or else the opportunity may pass by. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson asked ifthere was any reason the City could not make its <br />recommendation to Ramsey County, given what the City now knows. Mayor Probst stated that <br />the City would not have the benefit of an early endorsement of a concept. Therefore the City <br />will have to take what information is available now and move forward. <br /> <br />ADMINISTRATOR COMMENTS <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Mr. Post stated that at the last City Council meeting concerns had been raised by Councilmember <br />Larson regarding the language in the Land Conveyance Bill with the Minnesota National Guard. <br />The concern had been what the Minnesota National Guard was expecting relative to the use of <br />the proposed Maintenance Facility. Mr. Post stated that he had spoken to Colonel Dennis Lord, <br />Minnesota National Guard spokesman, who had indicated that the intent of the Minnesota <br />National Guard was not for the City and Ramsey County to build a facility for the agency. <br />Rather the intent had been to have access to the common areas of facility during weekend drills. <br /> <br />Mr. Post stated that he had circulated a draft copy ofthe Building Code recodification chapter. <br />He had not heard any feedback from the Councilmembers and assumed he could forward the <br />Chapter to the League of Milmesota Cities for incorporation into the City Code. The primary <br />change was to reference the Minnesota Building Code in many sections, rather than specifying <br />the Code in the language of the Ordinance. This reduced the length of the Building Code and <br />ensured that the City Code would always be in agreement with State requirements. <br /> <br />Mr. Post stated that he and Ms. Randall would be meeting with Metropolitan Council <br />representatives on Thursday, September 16, 1999. The meeting will be to discuss the status of <br />the Comprehensive Plan update. Mr. Post had recently received information regarding <br />deficiencies and his goal in meeting with the Metropolitan Council would be to gain a better <br />understanding of what these deficiencies may be in order to correct them. <br /> <br />Mr. Post stated that he would also inquire regarding the mandated update of the Watershed Plan <br />for the City's Storm Management Plan. His intent would be to come up with funding sources <br />and to relate this issue to the Water Quality Task Force, hoping to link these two efforts. <br /> <br />. Mr. Post stated that he would be meeting with the Minnesota Department of Transportation on <br />Thursday, September 16, 1999. The State has expressed concerns for how County Road I <br />