My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 09-13-1999
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
CC 09-13-1999
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:11:41 PM
Creation date
11/9/2006 2:39:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - SEPTEMBER 13,1999 <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />methodology, neighborhood approach, and reconstruction/overlay undertaken in two-year <br />cycles. <br />. Given recent staIT turnover, a revisiting of salary allocation assumptions. <br />. The conclusion and discussion of a Finance Operations Committee utility rate study upon <br />water, sanitary sewer, and storm water utility rates. The preliminary budget has assumed a <br />two percent increase in utility rates. <br />. The timing upon which the City obtains fee title to the TCAAP land conveyance property <br />such that City Hall construction can proceed. <br />. The outcome and timing of Maintenance Facility issues and options. <br /> <br />Mr. Post advised that staffrecommends the City Council adopt Resolution #99-30, Adopting the <br />Preliminary 2000 Budget. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson noted that $2,050,000 was allocated to the City Hall construction and <br />was included in the $3,500,000 Capital Project Fund. He asked what the remaining $1,450,000 <br />was for. Mr. Post stated that this was primarily the Capital Project expenditures for the street <br />construction projects. He noted that one million of the $1,136,998 in the Debt Service Fund and <br />one million of the $1,715,000 in the Capital Project Fund reflected a transfer between those two <br />fund categories to finance the City Hall construction project. <br /> <br />MOTION: <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson moved and Councilmember Aplikowski seconded a <br />motion to adopt Resolution #99-30, Adopting the Preliminary 2000 Budget. The <br />motion carried unanimously (5-0). <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />D. Resolution #99-31, Adopting the Truth in Taxation Public Hearing Dates for thc <br />Proposed 2000 Taxes Payable <br /> <br />Mr. Post explained that, in addition to certifYing the Preliminary Levy to Ramsey County for <br />proposed taxes payable in 1999, the City was also required to select Truth in Taxation public <br />hearing dates. The public hearing date selection process had been simplified by action taken by <br />the Legislature which reserves two dates for cities to schedule hearings. In the past, the City had <br />been limited to choosing dates that were not in conflict with other jurisdictions. The dates <br />reserved by the Legislature were Monday, December 6, 1999 and Monday December 13, 1999. <br /> <br />Considering the fact that the regular meeting of the City Council was scheduled for December <br />13, 1999, and the City cannot adopt a budget the same evening, Mr. Post recommended that the <br />City Council select Monday, December 6, 1999 as the Truth in Taxation public hearing date. <br />Monday, December 13, 1999 could be utilized as a continuation hearing date if necessary. This <br />would require a later adoption hearing date. In the past, the City has not needed the continuation <br />hearing. Therefore, the adoption hearing would be scheduled for Monday, December 13, ] 999. <br /> <br />Mr. Post advised that staff recommends the City Council adopt Resolution #99-31, Adopting the <br />Truth in Taxation Public Hearing Dates for the Proposed 2000 Taxes Payable. <br /> <br />. Mayor Probst confirmed that, if a continuation were needed, the City would be required to <br />schedule another date for the adoption hearing. Mr. Post stated that this was correct. If this were <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.