Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - OCTOBER 25, 1999 10 <br /> MOTION: Councilmember Aplikowski moved and Councilmember Larson seconded a <br /> . motion to continuc Planning Case #99-12, Site Plan, to the November 8, 1999 <br /> regular City Council meeting, The motion carried unanimously (4-0). <br /> 2. Case #99-18, Nathan Fjeld, 1929 Jerrold Avenue, Variance <br /> Ms. Randall explained that the applicant was requesting approval of a corner side yard setback <br /> variance (13 feet proposed, when 40 feet is required) and an accessory structure rear yard setback <br /> (6 feet proposed, when 10 feet is required) for a new garage on a single family lot zoned R-2, <br /> The applicant currently has a 24 by 28 foot garage located 6 feet from the north property line <br /> (rear) and 13 to 15 feet from the west property line (corner side). The applicant wished to <br /> demolish the existing garage and rebuild the detached garage in the same location and same size. <br /> Ms. Randall noted that the applicant had believed that the rear yard setback was 10 feet. <br /> According to information on hand, staff had found the setback to be six feet. She indicated that <br /> this must be confirmed prior to a building permit being secured. <br /> Ms. Randall stated that the existing garage is in disrepair and would either need to be repaired or <br /> replaced. Currently there is a large tree to the rear of the garage, The applicant hoped to <br /> preserve this tree and this was the reason for not moving the garage further to the east. This tree <br /> would not prevent the garage from being moved to the south to meet the 10 foot rear yard <br /> . setback requirement However, this would require a new pad for tbe garage. <br /> Tbe applicant could; bowever, minimize this request by reducing tbe garage depth to a standard <br /> 22 foot garage and tben only need a 19 foot variance. <br /> Prior A venue dead ends at the nortb end of tbe applicant's property line and is only used by two <br /> homes and trail access to Hazelnut park. The applicant could request a vacation of this portion of <br /> Prior Avenue, however, the City would still want to keep a trail easement and the applicant <br /> would still need a variance for the proposed garage. Additionally, there are utilities in this area <br /> which will need to be accessible. Tberefore, staff did not recommend the applicant request a <br /> vacation. <br /> Staff found that there were circumstances unique to the property in that the property in question <br /> is approximately 10,125 square feet in area on tbe corner ofJerrold Avenue and Prior Avenue, <br /> The applicant could reduce the garage depth to reduce the corner side yard setback variance to <br /> 19 feet The applicant could move the garage to the south to eliminate the need for a variance to <br /> the north. The proposed detached garage is close to a property line. Garages on lots in the <br /> surrounding area are closer than the Ordinance allows. <br /> Ms. Randall advised that the Planning Commission recommended approval of Planning Case <br /> #99-18, Corner Side Yard Setback Variance (13 feet proposed, wben 40 fect is required) for a <br /> . detached garage, conditioned on: <br />