Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - OCTOBER 25, 1999 21 <br /> . ADMINISTRATOR COMMENTS <br /> Mr. Post stated that a mailing had been received from AMM regarding legislative priorities for <br /> the next Session. He asked that the City Council attempt to rank these priorities prior to the next <br /> City Council meeting. Upon receiving the rankings from the Council, Mr. Post stated that he <br /> would forward rankings as a Resolution to the AMM prior to their policy adoption meeting. <br /> COUNCIL COMMENTS AND COMMITTEE LIAISON ACTIVITY REPORTS <br /> In order to avoid the situation with this evening's Planning Case #99-19, Councilmember Larson <br /> encouraged staff to discourage applicants from submitting variance requests without having a <br /> finn plan on paper available as to what will be built. <br /> Councilmember Larson suggested that during the winter time, staff consider the situation that <br /> arose this evening with regard to the industrial building on Gateway Boulevard, It was his belief <br /> that the City will receive more applications for new tenants in this building and, at this time, <br /> issues such as garbage disposal are up to the tenant to decide. He suggested that the Welsh <br /> Corporation be contacted to discuss a resolution, <br /> Mayor Probst agreed and added that, as more requests for generators come in, it will be <br /> important to better define screening requirements. He stated that it was difficult to find any <br /> . wood enclosures that do not deteriorate over time. <br /> With regard to the Pacesetter leased space on Gateway Boulevard, Mr. Post noted that there had <br /> been an expectation when this building was constructed that MSL would be leasing the property <br /> as an extension to their campus. This action did not take place, which created a different set of <br /> circumstances than was originally anticipated. <br /> Council member Aplikowski stated that the Finance and Operations Committee will be bringing <br /> forth a resolution with regard to the time spent by City staff installing dead-end signs. In order to <br /> alleviate the time spent by staff, the Committee was suggesting that the City Council adopt a <br /> policy stating that if a petition is received by the City signed by at least 75 percent ofthe affected <br /> residents, City staff can authorize the installation of a street sign without prior review by the <br /> Committee or City Council. <br /> Mr. Post noted that this Ordinance would only apply to dead-end or no-through street signs. <br /> Councilmember Aplikowski concurred, She stated that she would present the policy to the City <br /> Council at its November 8, 1999 meeting for review, <br /> Councilmember Rem stated that the Parks and Recreation Committee toured the local parks on <br /> Saturday, October 16, 1999, She indicated that the Committee will discuss its concerns at its <br /> next meeting and will forward the concerns to the City Council. <br /> . <br />