Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - NOVEMBER 8, 1999 14 <br /> . from the standards without the City Council having agreed on the rationale behind the suggested <br /> street widths. He felt that this issue could be discussed at the public meeting, however, he would <br /> be hesitant to present an official document stating deviated standards. <br /> Mr. Post noted that the assessment policy required the City Council to adopt a benefit rate based <br /> upon a 32-foot residential street. Varying the street width could result in a variance of the <br /> benefit. <br /> Councilmember Malone stated that an assessment rate that would go up $10.00 per household <br /> was too high. He expressed concern for abandoning the portion of Hamline Avenue. Although <br /> the road was in bad shape, he did not believe that the residents would support this option. <br /> With regard to the proposed road widths, Councilmember Aplikowski noted that the City had <br /> previously constructed a 24-foot roadway and the City had felt that this had been a mistake. She <br /> did not feel that it would be acceptable to set a 24- foot short road standard and she was hesitant <br /> to put this suggestion on paper. She noted that some cities now consider a 28-foot width to be a <br /> standard roadway when the standard width had been 32 feet. She indicated that the road she <br /> works on had been changed from 32 feet to 28 feet and, although the road does function, she <br /> misses the extra four feet. She noted, however, that a new road width may be easier to accept if <br /> it were to bring the assessment total down. <br /> Councilmember Aplikowski expressed concern for the scope of the work. She agreed that it <br /> . would make sense to attempt the reconstruction of an entire neighborhood at one time. However, <br /> she was not sure the City could afford the entire project. <br /> Mayor Probst stated that he too was concerned for the scope of the project and felt that there <br /> would have to be some way to make the numbers work. He suggested that one option may be to <br /> cut the project in half over the next couple of years. The difficulty with the storm drainage was <br /> that the first half would be heavily front end loaded since the downstream portion must be built <br /> first. He was not sure there would be a logical way to split the project. Councilmember Malone <br /> suggested the possibility of performing the utility work one year and the road reconstruction the <br /> next. <br /> Mayor Probst asked what the City received annually from the State Aid fund. Mr. Brown stated <br /> that the City received $200,000 annually. Mayor Probst asked what other projects were coming <br /> up for the City. Mr. Post stated that the Round Lake Road, Phase II project was the next project. <br /> Mayor Probst asked how much State Aid the City would be eligible to borrow. Mr. Post stated <br /> that the maximum was $500,000. Mr. Brown noted that this would depend upon how much was <br /> available in the State Aid budget. <br /> With regard to the abandorunent of a portion of Hamline Avenue, Couneilmember Aplikowski <br /> agreed that the residents that currently utilize this section of roadway would not be pleased with <br /> this option. However, they would most likely get used to the new traffic pattern. She would be <br /> . in favor of the abandorunent if the cost benefit was greater than the convenience benefit. <br />