Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~iinutes of Special Counci I ~:eeting <br />Page eight <br /> <br />Apri I 21, 1975 <br /> <br />units and this Ordinance requirement of Ord. 147 was applicable. <br />After discussion re present method of installation, with <br />residents of Arden Maner present at the meeting, hook-up and <br />Installation is apparently not a problem for the residents. <br /> <br />Council directed Building Inspector Squires to review Mobile <br />Home Association pier standards. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Sections 5.7 and 5.8 <br />Adams advised he can require tie-downs by lease, but does not <br />want to be req~ired to make the tie-downs himself because of <br />the Ii abi II ty, because of variety in sl ze and shape of homes, <br />and because of cost to tie-down. (Tie-downs are not requl red, <br />by the State, according to Adams.) <br /> <br />Adams said he can provide "tie-down" packages for home owners <br />at about $40.00, plus straps at about $4.25 each - they do the <br />work themse I ves. <br /> <br />Section 6.7 <br />No variance is needed, intent of Ordinance is to not include <br />occasional situations, but to not al low permanent parking of <br />campers and trai lers for occupancy. <br /> <br />Vogl reviewed the 12 conditions recommended by the Planning Commission <br />(Minutes of 4/1/75) and presented Counci I with amended lot completion <br />schedule. <br /> <br />Con d i t i on III <br />Adams stated that lot completion means sodded, landscaped, all utilities <br />and streets installed. <br /> <br />Vogl indicated that Adams takes exception to the $IOO/day penalty <br />for non-completion - damages should be commensurate to damages <br />sustained; suggested that Adams be given another chance to complete <br />on schedule - penalty 'adds little incentive. <br /> <br />Mrs. Adams said that weather and strikes could prevent completion .as <br />scheduled, Wingert noted that the project should not be as weather <br />sensitive as it was during early development since the majority of <br />utility and street work has been completed; therefore strikes and <br />"acts of God" should be the only reasons to be considered for not <br />completing lots on schedule. . '~~ <br /> <br />After' review of i-he comp leti on schedu Ie presented, counci'I::U~~~, " <br />the schedule by 3 weeks (15 working days) for each phase, and ~~ <br />completion of the Bui Iding after completion of the 1st 65 lots. . <br />Schedule was also corrected to add lots 172-190 (10 lots were omitted <br />from schedule). It was noted that the recreational park Is not <br />included on the schedule. Adams said he does not have the speci- <br />fications from Buckley. <br /> <br />It was noted that Water Syst~m completion date is also omitted from <br />schedule - Counci I reminded Adams that existing system Is approved <br />for only the 1st 51 lots. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />According to schedule presented, dri I ling for wel I for remainder of <br />lots should be started in May If 51 lots are scheduled for completion <br />by June 30th. <br /> <br />Adams said he will contact Banister Engineering immediately re cost <br />of test on existing system; wi I I put in new well now if test is to <br />'be cost Iy. <br /> <br />Condi ti on No.2 <br />Delete second sent~nce from Adams' reply. Adams agrees to furnish <br />and install park equipment as per specifications submitted by Buckley. <br /> <br />Condi ti on No.3 <br />Council has not determined that metal-sided homes should be Included <br />in Arden Manor park; not ori:~inal intent and restriction to tlood- <br />side homes is reason many residents moved into Arden Manor. <br /> <br />-8- <br />