Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Minutes of Regular Counci I Meeting <br />Page four <br /> <br />Api-i I 14, 1975 <br /> <br />Wingert said his concern is the traffic generated by service stations, <br />not necessarily the gasoline storage; reluctant to stretch a non- <br />conforming service station use forever; has no concern re the grocery <br />portion of the operation. <br /> <br />, <br />Feyereisen felt there was probably as much traffic with the grocery <br />as with the service station. <br /> <br />Rei ling said that there has been a gas station on this site since <br />about 1930, anticipates grocery and station would generate about 1000 <br />cars/month. <br /> <br />Crichton asked Reiling about his plans, If the permit to operate the <br />service statiorr is re-Instated. <br /> <br />. Rei ling described the remode ling of the grocery/gas station operation <br />as follows: <br /> <br />I . <br /> <br />Move grocery area to service station side of bui Idlng, which <br />would be a more suitable location and better uti lization of <br />the space. Rei ling explained that the grocery store Is over- <br />crowded an9 part of the house is used for storage. <br />Replace gas pumps with more modern equipment. <br />Modernize exterior of the bui Iding by adding rough cedar <br />siding (providing a more residential appearance) - an effort <br />to make corner more aesthet~cally pleasing and provide a more <br />functional operation. <br /> <br />(Reiling said he would'no longer sell trai I.rs - this was an interim <br />operation) . <br /> <br />2. <br />3. <br /> <br />Crichton said that, as Woodburn and Feyerelsen pointed out, he agrees <br />there are technicalities, through acts of God and difficulties Involved <br />here, but he also feols that one of the problems has been aesthetics; <br />If plans are submitted that do make this site more properly repre- <br />sentative of Arden Hills, It could be a desirable solution for this <br />difficult corner; maybe not the best solution for everybody, but cer- <br />tainly a balanced conclusion - under those circumstances he said he <br />could agree that the grandfather clause .has not really been violated. <br /> <br />Woodburn and Crep03~ agreed they'd be very cognizant of the aesthetics <br />and visual standards of this site in the future - that this has basi- <br />cally been one of the problems. <br /> <br />Rei ling said that he Initially expressed his desire to Improve the <br />aesthetlcs,of the property; his proposed plans for the bui Iding wi II <br />'defi~~tely be an improvement. <br />, <br /> <br />It was the Council consensus that Re~rlng present plans for the remodel- <br />ing to the Planning Commission for its recommendations to the Counci I. <br /> <br />(Wingert to relay to the Planning C6mmission that It not concern itself <br />with Ordinance details, but to consider the bui Iding plans from an <br />aesthetic viewpoint.) <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Resolution No. 75-18, Corporate Authorization Resolution Amendina <br />Resolution No. 75-1 <br />Wingert moved, seconded by Feyereisen, that Counei I adopt Resolution <br />No. 75-18; authorizing its execution by the Mayor and Clerk Administra- <br />tor. Motion carried unan~mously. <br /> <br />Suburban Pick-up Service - Rate Change <br />McNiesh referred Counci I to letter from Suburban Pick-up Service, ad- <br />vising of a proposed rate change effective July I, 1975, from $3.50 <br />to $4.00/month. <br /> <br />After discussion, McNiesh was requested to ask Suburban Pick-up Ser- <br />vice to substantiate this increase, since it Is the seco'nd rate in- <br />crease within about a year. <br /> <br />CErA Adult Work Experience Program <br />McNiesh ,referred Counci I to her memo of 4/11/75. After discussion, <br />Council concurred that the Vi IIage not participate In the Work Experi- <br />enc Program. <br /> <br />-4- <br />