Laserfiche WebLink
Commissioner Jebens-Singh asked if staff believed the project was on pace in order to complete <br />the development as proposed. Director Mitchell stated the preliminary development <br />agreement expires on June 30 and staff has discussed the JDA Advisory Committee meeting <br />with Alatus to discuss the progress that has been made on the preliminary development <br />agreement. <br /> <br />Commissioner Monson requested an update on the take down of the land. Director Mitchell <br />explained Alatus shared a purchase agreement with the County two or three weeks ago and the <br />County has been reviewing this document. She reported clarifying questions were being asked <br />of the developer at this time. <br /> <br />Commissioner Monson commented the JDA previously discussed if the June 30 timeline would <br />be met. She indicated there was a great deal of work that had to be done prior to June 30. She <br />requested further information regarding the 30-day clock. Director Mitchell stated after <br />consultation between the parties, which could look like a meeting between the JDA Advisory <br />Committee and Alatus, one of the parties could choose to give a 30-day notice. She indicated <br />the earliest this notice could be given would be April 7. <br /> <br />Chair Wicklund supported the JDA Advisory Committee holding this meeting with Alatus, if this <br />was the consensus of the JDA. <br /> <br />Commissioner McGuire agreed with Commissioner Monson that the JDA should get things <br />moving sooner rather than later. <br /> <br />Commissioner Weber stated he wanted to see the JDA negotiate in good faith and <br />recommended if the JDA Advisory Committee were to meet with Alatus that this be done in <br />earnest given the tight timeline and the number of things that had yet to be completed. He <br />supported the consultation meeting being held between the JDA Advisory Committee and <br />Alatus. <br /> <br />Chair Wicklund requested further comment from the JDA Attorney on the process that must be <br />followed. <br /> <br />JDA Attorney Boulton explained a consultation meeting would have to be held with Alatus after <br />which time a determination could be made that there hasn’t been substantial agreement to the <br />terms. The JDA Advisory Committee would provide the opportunity for the consultation and <br />would report back to the JDA. The JDA could then decide what to do from that point. <br /> <br />Commissioner Weber supported the JDA Advisory Committee requesting a consultation <br />meeting with Alatus as a show of good faith. <br /> <br />Commissioner Jebens-Singh agreed this was the next step. <br />