My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-17-2025 JDA Agenda Packet
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Joint Development Authority (JDA)
>
JDA Agenda Packets
>
2025
>
03-17-2025 JDA Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/9/2025 4:20:28 PM
Creation date
4/9/2025 4:19:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Monson requested further information regarding the process that would have to <br />be followed by Ryan Companies in order to amend the TRC. Director Jagoe explained if the <br />applicant chooses to seek a TRC amendment, this would be a 60 day process. She indicated a <br />TRC amendment would also have to be approved by the County, which will add a couple more <br />weeks to the process. She stated a final approval would also be needed from the JDA, which <br />may add another 30 days to the process. She reported final plans would be needed in order to <br />consider a TRC amendment. She explained a public hearing would have to be held by the City <br />and JDA. <br /> <br />Chair Wicklund asked if there were any project stopping comments from the JDA. <br /> <br />Chair Wicklund requested an example of a TRC code that the JDA could modify within a certain <br />percentage. Director Jagoe discussed the TRC parking requirements and noted the JDA could <br />approve a deviation of 10%, otherwise a TRC amendment would have to be considered by the <br />City. <br /> <br />Chair Wicklund commented on how the TRC deviations were built into the code in 2016 in <br />order to allow for minor variances without having to go back to the City for consideration. <br /> <br />Commissioner Monson reported she supported the proposed variances in Attachment C. She <br />suggested Ryan Companies provide staff with feedback on potential development hurdles. <br /> <br />Commissioner McGuire stated she would welcome any feedback Ryan Companies had <br />regarding any difficulties they were having with the TRC. She commented she was more <br />concerned with the sustainability goals than the requested variances. <br /> <br />Commissioner Weber indicated he did not have any issues with the proposed variance <br />requests. He was of the opinion the EV parking information was very short within Ryan’s <br />proposal and asked that this be further investigated in order to meet the sustainability <br />guidelines. <br /> <br />Commissioner Jebens-Singh questioned if the TRC was too stringent in order to meet the <br />practical application for building materials. She stated it would be helpful to understand how <br />much of this project was deviating from traditional building codes and sustainability standards. <br />Mr. Wolf stated he would try and quantify this for the JDA. <br /> <br />Commissioner Weber suggested Ryan Companies attend a future JDA worksession meeting in <br />order to provide an update on the plans. <br /> <br />Administrative Director’s Report <br /> <br />Ms. Mitchell noted the County was working on an amendment for the purchase and sale <br />agreement for the first ten acres of Outlot A and the remaining portion would be closed on <br />later. She then provided the JDA with a legislative update noting Ramsey County would be
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.