My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-14-25-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2025
>
04-14-25-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2025 2:15:37 PM
Creation date
4/15/2025 2:14:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
178
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – MARCH 10, 2025 19 <br /> <br />Councilmember Monson said even when a Council Liaison sits on a committee they aren’t <br />speaking for the Council, as a whole. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant said there have been times where Councilmembers and Committee members have <br />held outside meetings and tried to persuade others of the Council’s position. It wasn’t really the <br />Council’s position, it was that one person’s. <br /> <br />Councilmember Monson said it would be hard to control what someone says outside. She <br />doesn’t know what other members say to constituents. She isn’t going to police that. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant said this has happened from the bench and with outside meetings with developers. <br />People have tried to convince developers that they were speaking for the Planning Commission. <br /> <br />Councilmember Monson said in that situation it’s on the developer. They should be smarter than <br />that. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant said we should be smarter than that, too. We should say if you are on the Council <br />or on a committee or commission you speak for yourself. <br /> <br />Councilmember Weber sees one glaring issue with that. As the Liaison it is your duty to speak <br />to the committees and commissions, when they ask questions, on behalf of the Council. We aren’t <br />promoting our own agenda, but we are speaking on behalf of Council. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant said we can have a whole discussion on the liaison role. It is not intended to lead <br />the committee. It is not a voting position. It’s a resource. Sometimes you offer an opinion. The <br />liaison is not there speaking for the Council. They are there to take information from the meeting <br />and come back to Council with what the committees are doing. Some liaisons may get more <br />involved with their committees. They are always speaking on behalf of themselves and their own <br />views. <br /> <br />Councilmember Monson said that doesn’t apply for the Fire Board. We are voting on what the <br />City wants to do. <br /> <br />Councilmember Weber said there is a liaison item to be discussed on the Agenda Planning list. <br />He thinks this is beyond the scope of this discussion. <br /> <br />Councilmember Monson said overall, she is okay with the Code of Conduct. She want’s <br />something separate for the Council. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant said the bottom line is “be kind”. Can we legislate that? <br /> <br />Councilmember Monson asked if Mayor Grant wants “be kind” removed. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant said no, he thinks it needs to be in there. There were some inappropriate swipes at <br />the last meeting. Someone indicated that he and Councilmember Holden should have made a <br />comment about something we knew nothing about. A former Councilmember passed away. <br />Neither he nor Councilmember Holden knew that. There was an accusation questioning why we <br />didn’t bring it up. Those kinds of things shouldn’t have a place here. He thinks that wasn’t kind. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.