My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-14-25-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2025
>
04-14-25-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2025 2:15:37 PM
Creation date
4/15/2025 2:14:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
178
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – MARCH 10, 2025 6 <br /> <br />9. PULLED CONSENT ITEMS <br /> <br />A. Motion to Approve Extension for Recording of Final Plat – 1700 Highway 96 <br />W – Trident Development <br /> <br />Councilmember Weber stated he pulled this item to acknowledge what this item means. He <br />indicated he voted against this project in January because he believed affordability should have <br />been a component of this project. He stated the argument at that time was that the City could not <br />afford to delay the project. He reported now the Council was now being asked for an extension, <br />which meant there was time to discuss affordability. He explained the developer was never going <br />to seriously consider affordable units. He indicated the Council was being asked to consider an <br />extension for the Final Plat without any consideration of revisiting affordable units. He stated this <br />land would not sit empty forever as the church would continue to find a partner that was <br />interested in developing this land. He explained the City was under not obligation to approve the <br />extension and he thought voting against this request would send a clear message that Arden Hills <br />does not reward developers that ignore the communities needs. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant stated he disagreed with Councilmember Weber, noting the developer brought <br />forward an affordable component that was costly. He indicated affordable housing was not free, <br />but rather there was a financial aspect that the City was asked to participate in and the City chose <br />not to. He explained he supported approving the extension. <br /> <br />Councilmember Monson reported she believed the offer from the developer was a joke and she <br />made that clear in January. She was of the opinion the offer was so unattractive that the City had <br />no option but to say no to the affordable units. She commented it was also clear that because the <br />City doesn’t have any affordable housing requirements, the City puts itself at risk trying to deny a <br />project that does not have an affordability component. She recommended the City Council pursue <br />an affordable housing policy and that this be put into ordinance in order to support affordable <br />housing going forward. She asked that staff speak to why this request has come to the City. <br /> <br />City Administrator Jagoe reported this request came about because staff was working on the <br />logistical language within the development agreement, but it was not yet finalized. She <br />anticipated this agreement would be finalized by April. She explained staff was working to have <br />the recording of the final plat and the development agreement happen at the same time. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant asked if the City Attorney was working on the development agreement and <br />questioned if it was close to completion. <br /> <br />City Attorney Bjerkness reported the document was close to completion, noting both parties <br />have exchanged redlines, but the document was not ready in time for the City packet. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant stated the developer was working in earnest to complete the development <br />agreement. <br /> <br />Councilmember Weber commented he would like to see this item going back to a work session <br />in order to allow the City Council to have a serious discussion regarding affordability. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.