CC 01-02-1997 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. . . ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - JANUARY 2. 1997 6 I. 2, Compliance with the maximum height for structures; Compliance with the required building setbacks; Compliance with requirements ofthe Shoreland Management Regulations; Razing the caretakers building at 4040 Old Highway 10 within two years of approval of this request. or within one year from the date of Bethel College's next site plan approval, whichever occurs first; Termination of the on-campus Friends of Bethel Christmas Tree sales operation by January I, 1997; Establislunent of a review period of 5 years to review general activity on campus, These reviews would look at issues such as enrollment trends, any short or long range changes in the site plan or building additions, The first of such reviews would occur 5 years from the date of approval of this action, unless the College proposes an amendment to the SUP before that date, SUP Amendments will still require Public Hearings whether or not they occur at the same time as the regular five-year review; Preparation of a comprehensive traffic impact study, by Bethel College, within one year of approval of this request; and Modification of the Campus Master Plan, such that all structures meet the minimum requirements ofthe City Code, , y, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, Councilmember Hicks asked if Bethel College had a plan for the parcel of land on the west side of Old Highway 10, Craig Hjelle, Director of Campus Planning, stated there were no plans for that area, Mayor Probst questioned the disposition of the house that is in disrepair. Mr. Hjelle explained it is a requirement of this application that the house be razed within two years or within one year from the date of Bethel College's next site plan approval, whichever occurs first, He stated he has obtained a verbal estimate for this procedure, He would like to have the house removed sooner but is not certain if there are funds in the budget for this procedure, The house is currently used for storage but there is additional storage available on the southeast comer of the site, Councilmember Aplikowski stated she felt the Master Plan looked wonderful. She noted removal of the building as soon as possible would be healthy for the entire neighborhood, She questioned if the Planning Commission felt that the walkways and skyways were not in compliance with the City's standards, Mr. Ringwald eXplained there had been confusion of the level of detail included in a Master Plan, The architectural details will be included in the specific site plan, Councilmember Malone noted that condition #8 of the Planning Commission had been satisfied and would not need to be included as part of City Council approval.